2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study

Abstract: ObjectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to detect imaging features on chest X-ray (CXR) with a comprehensive AI model capable of detecting 124 CXR findings being recently developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world usefulness of the model as a diagnostic assistance device for radiologists.DesignThis prospective real-world multicentre study involved a group of radiologists using the model in their daily reporting workflow to report consecutive CXRs and recording… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
24
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the AUCs for standalone AI performance reported in our study are lower than those in prior studies [ 24 ], the assessed AI algorithm detected several missed findings not documented in the original radiology reports. The incremental value of AI for interpreting CXRs in our study follows the trends reported in other AI studies [ 23 , 25 ]. The lower AUCs obtained with the assessed AI algorithm for some missed findings in our study are likely related to the fact that missed findings are more likely to be subtle or difficult to detect, and therefore bring an additional level of complexity to AI performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the AUCs for standalone AI performance reported in our study are lower than those in prior studies [ 24 ], the assessed AI algorithm detected several missed findings not documented in the original radiology reports. The incremental value of AI for interpreting CXRs in our study follows the trends reported in other AI studies [ 23 , 25 ]. The lower AUCs obtained with the assessed AI algorithm for some missed findings in our study are likely related to the fact that missed findings are more likely to be subtle or difficult to detect, and therefore bring an additional level of complexity to AI performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The most frequent and clinically important missed findings included lung nodules and consolidation at all eight participating sites in both India and the US. A high frequency of missed lung nodules on CXRs has also been reported in prior studies [ 23 ]. Apart from the distribution of missed radiographic findings, our study reports on the performance of an AI validation platform (CARPL) and an AI-CXR algorithm (Qure.ai).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We have observed encouraging signs, however, within a large practice currently using machine learning systems to facilitate radiology interpretation and diagnosis. These signs include subjectively improved concentration levels and a broad acceptance (even amongst early critics) that these systems do offer useful assistance and that their effects are likely to benefit patients [60]. In addition, we have observed renewed enthusiasm amongst radiologists for their clinical work.…”
Section: Potential Future Benefits Of Ctb Machine Learning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mature implementation necessitates an evaluation of effective clinical workflow integration and change management. With appropriate risk management and mature development and implementation, applied CTB machine learning systems have the potential to drive substantial clinical benefits and meaningful improvements in healthcare [60].…”
Section: Potential Future Benefits Of Ctb Machine Learning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single AI application for multiple tasks has been scantly reported. 16 Concerning AI performance, radiologists should confirm AI results at the initial AI software implementation in their departments and continue monitoring. 17 Additionally, AI cannot correlate the exam with the patients' clinical results as radiologists can.…”
Section: Radiologists' Roles In Ai Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%