Assessment of the effects of a group intervention program used in home-dwelling elderly individuals to promote home exercise and prevent locomotive syndrome

Abstract

[Purpose] We assessed the effects of a group intervention program used in home-dwelling elderly individuals to promote home exercise and prevent locomotive syndrome. [Participants and Methods] Pre- and post-intervention evaluations were performed in all participants. Group intervention was performed thrice between the pre- and post-intervention evaluations in all participants. A total of 19 elderly individuals participated in the pre- and post-intervention evaluations. Tests used for evaluation were the two-step test, standing-up test, and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale. [Results] Among all participants in this study, 12 who performed all 3 aforementioned tests were classified as the non-absence group, whereas 7 who were absent more than once were classified as the absence group. We examined intergroup differences with respect to changes between the pre- and post-intervention evaluations, and we observed significant changes only in the results of the two-step test. [Conclusion] We conclude that low-frequency intervention in the form of workshops led to positive results with respect to improved physical function in home-dwelling elderly individuals.

Comparative trial of the effects of continuous locomotion training provided at pharmacies: a pilot study

“…Consequently, the results of the 25-question GLFS, straight leg raising test, and standing time on one leg improved overtime. These findings were consistent with those of a previous study [ 4 ]. It should be noted that the effect of Locotra was positively correlated with the implementation percentage of days of Locotra and not the number of Locotra exercises.…”

“…This training consists of exercises such as standing on one leg with eyes open and squatting. The beneficial effects of these exercises have been reported by other researchers [ 4 , 5 ]. Although Locotra is safe and feasible to practice at home, the location where instructions should be provided, and subsequent follow-up has not been decided upon.…”

“…Several studies have documented the effectiveness of Locotra. For example, three locomotion training sessions were conducted for elderly home-dwelling people, and the results for the 25-question GLFS, stand-up test, and two-step test improved for those who attended all three sessions compared with those who were absent for more than one session [ 4 ]. In another study, it was reported that the results of the one leg standing test and sit-to-stand test were improved by home-visit locomotion training, with telephone support, for elderly people who were not attending any preventive-care program [ 5 ].…”

“…Locomo clinical decision limits were established in two stages. The beginning of the decline in mobility functions was categorized as stage 1, and a progression in mobility function decline was categorized as stage 2 [ 4 ]. The participants of this study were those with Locomo stage 1.…”

Impact of Habitual Exercise on Locomotive Function of Middle-aged and Elderly Volunteers: A Longitudinal Study

“…Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between exercise habits and LS among community-dwelling people. 28 , 29 , 30 ) Kota et al 31 ) reported that home exercise intervention led to improved physical function in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Maruya et al 32 ) showed the effectiveness of a 6-month exercise program for improving GLFS-25 scores.…”