2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00288-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location subject to reduced range of hip motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
116
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the hip joint center has been located on humans using numerical optimization of motion data of the thigh (Cappozzo, 1984;Leardini et al, 1999), this is not feasible for ostriches since the femur has a very small range of motion (Gatesy and Biewener, 1991), which can result in error (Piazza et al, 2004). Instead, the hip joint center was defined statically.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the hip joint center has been located on humans using numerical optimization of motion data of the thigh (Cappozzo, 1984;Leardini et al, 1999), this is not feasible for ostriches since the femur has a very small range of motion (Gatesy and Biewener, 1991), which can result in error (Piazza et al, 2004). Instead, the hip joint center was defined statically.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the functional method depends on ROMs, the type and amplitude of the movement of the femur relative to the pelvis, markers location, and the number of data samples. Thus, it may be inefficient when motion is limited and it would result HJC location errors of 26 mm [26] [28] [37]. However, the error would be much more during motions like walking, ascending stair and descending stair [26].…”
Section: Hip Joint Centermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In biomechanics, some studies that estimate the joint center (Ehrig, Taylor, Duda, & Heller, 2006;Gamage & Lasenby, 2002;Piazza, Erdemir, Okita, & Cavanagh, 2004;Siston & Delp, 2006) can be considered as linear models. However, systematic modeling were not carried out because procedures for determining the uncertainty of estimation parameters and goodness of fit of the model were not performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate , which is expressed by a proximal segment coordinate system, a method called transformation method (Ehrig et al, 2006;Piazza et al, 2004;Siston & Delp, 2006) should be used. This is the segment coordinate system being given as transformation matrix in Equation 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%