“…For example, the CAESAR-Lisflood (C-L) model , the CAESAR LEM model (Coulthard et al, 2002) integrated with the Lisflood-FP 2D hydrodynamic model (Bates & De Roo, 2000;Bates et al, 2010), offers a choice of three approaches for calculating sediment transport: the Meyer-Peter and Müller (1948) empirical formula for moderate transport rates of gravel, the Einstein (1950) statistical method for sandy rivers and the Wilcock and Crowe (2003) empirical approach derived from mixed gravel and sand tests that gives accurate predictions of transient bed armouring aggradation and degradation. The CAESAR LEM or integrated CAESAR-Lisflood models both use a digital elevation model to define topography and have been applied to simulate land evolution scenarios for many parts of the world (Coulthard et al, 2002(Coulthard et al, , 2005Coulthard & Macklin, 2003Coulthard & Van De Wiel, 2013Feeney et al, 2020;Hancock, 2009;Liu & Coulthard, 2017;Ramirez et al, 2020Ramirez et al, , 2022Skinner & Coulthard, 2023;Skinner et al, 2018;Van De Wiel et al, 2007;Wong et al, 2021;Ziliani et al, 2020). Recently, Skinner et al (2018) carried out a sensitivity analysis of the C-L (v1.8f) model using 50 m and 10 m DEMs for the Swale catchment, UK (a temperate, perennial medium-sized catchment with an area of 181 km 2 ), and the Tin Camp Creek catchment, Australia (a tropical, ephemeral small catchment with an area of 0.5 km 2 ) considering bedload only (without using suspended sediment processes in the model).…”