Assessment of the Geotourism Resource Potential of the Satun UNESCO Global Geopark, Thailand

Cheablam, Onanong; Tansakul, Pavit; Nantakat, Budsarin; Pantaruk, Sirinan

doi:10.1007/s12371-021-00609-0

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the same period, the adoption rate of ecotourism on geoheritage in geotourism globally also increased rapidly (Hasana et al, 2022;Herrera-Franco et al, 2022). Román and Umaña (2020), Cheablam et al (2021) argue that after the COVID-19 pandemic the opening of tourist attractions began to be implemented. This analysis reveals a potential explanation for the rise of publications in this subject and beyond starting in 2021.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution of Ecotourism on Geoheritage in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

SUTIKSNO,

SOUISA,

PURNOMO

et al. 2024

GTG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study is to examine the evolution of Ecotourism on Geoheritage through bibliometric analysis. Total of 53 papers pertaining exclusively to the domain of Ecotourism on Geoheritage, spanning from 2008 to 2022, were gathered from the Scopus database. This study examines the core aspects and features of Ecotourism on Geoheritage in academic research. It employs topic analysis, concurrence analysis, and timeline analysis of author keywords to investigate factors such as annual publication contribution, popularity, and focus. Furthermore, the analysis incorporates many productive entities, including journals, authors, institutions, countries, regions, and the mapping of significant collaboration links. These elements are utilized to determine the level of attention received by different entities in the field of Ecotourism on Geoheritage research. Furthermore, this study examines the citation structure of authors and journals and provides a detailed analysis of burst detection in cited authors, journals, and references. Ultimately, the study findings will be integrated with the present financial circumstances to delve further into future development obstacles and prospects. This bibliometric analysis reveals a consistent rise in yearly publications, a notable shift in emphasis towards financial inclusion, a prevailing presence of authors from Australia, and a growing number of international collaborations and publications from diverse sources. These findings indicate that the field of Ecotourism on Geoheritage is dynamic and holds promise for future scientific advancement. Hence, this exhaustive analysis of the Ecotourism on Geoheritage document not only examines the features and course of existing research but also assists researchers in identifying the appropriate research starting point and conducting thorough investigations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution of Ecotourism on Geoheritage in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

SUTIKSNO,

SOUISA,

PURNOMO

et al. 2024

GTG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(2022) mentioned, such as social networks, community capacity and active citizenship. The pandemic affected residents, the environment and economic activities, particularly tourism, as some authors have already explored (Bakar and Rosbi, 2020; Cheablam et al. , 2021; Zhu and Deng, 2020).…”

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When the participants spoke about the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified a high level of sociocultural capital and subcapitals that Gkartzios et al (2022) mentioned, such as social networks, community capacity and active citizenship. The pandemic affected residents, the environment and economic activities, particularly tourism, as some authors have already explored (Bakar and Rosbi, 2020;Cheablam et al, 2021;Zhu and Deng, 2020). Although unexpected events such as pandemics or natural disasters greatly affect social life and diminish economic and land capital, as well as overall well-being, especially in vulnerable places, people exercise community resilience through sociocultural capital.…”

Section: Sociocultural Rural Capitalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward “good” islands: rethinking the means and goals for island development from a female perspective

Ursić,

Zlatar Gamberožić,

Mišetić

2023

JTF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeBy merging good countryside and rural capitals frameworks, a model for reimagining the island's development is formulated, which is then applied to the female perspective to provide valuable insights from a group that is often marginalized in rural areas. As Croatian islands are highly tourism-oriented, this study finds it important to explore possibilities for future island development that can provide balanced and vibrant settlements on the islands.Design/methodology/approachThe present paper synthesizes Shucksmith's (2018) model of a good countryside, which serves as a goal, with Gkartzios et al.'s (2022) capitals framework, which is viewed as a means of attaining a good countryside, specifically a good island. The research is delimited to the island of Brac, Croatia. By conducting interviews with female respondents, this study aims to capture the female perspective on envisioning potential futures of “good” island living, a perspective that is frequently underestimated despite its significant contributions to the creation of an ideal locale.FindingsThe results demonstrate that there is a substantial amount of socio-cultural rural capital that is leveraged to strengthen relatedness and rights as development objectives. However, low levels of economic, built and land-based rural capital pose challenges to achieving repair and re-enchantment, which are crucial for settlements that rely on tourism.Originality/valueThese findings bear immense implications for policymakers and planners, underscoring the imperative to account for the perspectives and needs of diverse social groups, including women, in the design and implementation of development strategies for islands. By doing so, a sustainable and equitable future, rich in tourism potential, can be cultivated on the island.

show abstract

“…In general, the research results of the evaluation of the tourism development potential of cultural heritage are relatively rich, and the research objects are diversified, involving world heritage sites, linear cultural heritage, agricultural cultural heritage, intangible cultural heritage, etc. [23][24][25][26][27], but there are few research results on CTDP. In the tourism development of cultural heritage, it is very important to evaluate the value and development status of cultural heritage resources from two dimensions [13,28,29].…”

Section: Literature Review 221 Cultural Tourism Development Potentialmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Cultural Tourism Development Potential: The Case of the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River

Chen,

Li,

et al. 2023

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural tourism development potential (CTDP) is the future value and supporting force of the environmental value, economic and social efficiency, innovation ability and supporting system of cultural tourism. At present, there are few relevant studies on CTDP, but the research results on the tourism development potential of cultural heritage are relatively rich, and the existing evaluation methods lack comprehensiveness, dynamics and visualization. Based on systems theory and sustainable development theory, this article attempts to innovate and collect time series data through the entropy method, multi-index comprehensive evaluation method, spatial kernel density estimation method, and centroid transferring model. The temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and the CTDP of 43 cities in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River are examined and analyzed. It is found that the CTDP in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River is divided into five levels; the overall potential intensity of the research area is small and has significant spatial differences; influenced by the time factor, the interaction and spatial correlation of within the research area are significant; the development of regional cultural tourism has strong regional dependence in the short range. The center of potential gradually moves to the geometric center. This study is significant for promoting the sustainable development of economic tourism in cradles of world civilization.

show abstract

Assessment of the Geotourism Resource Potential of the Satun UNESCO Global Geopark, Thailand

Cited by 10 publications

References 30 publications

The Evolution of Ecotourism on Geoheritage in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

The Evolution of Ecotourism on Geoheritage in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Toward “good” islands: rethinking the means and goals for island development from a female perspective

Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Cultural Tourism Development Potential: The Case of the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About