2013
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2013.54043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Impact of the Landfill on Groundwater Quality: A Case Study of the Mediouna Site, Casablanca, Morocco

Abstract:

A local case study for the environmental impact of landfill leachate on groundwater quality along and across the Mediouna landfill is presented, based on physicochemical and statistical approaches. The landfill has been operational since 1986 and it receives municipal solid wastes produced by the city of Casablanca, whose the daily waste output exceeds 4000 Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four factors were extracted to represent the main factors for groundwater quality, and to identify the different pollution sources. The first factor, with the principal components of total hardness, Cl − and TDS (greater than 0.900) and the secondary components of SO 4 2− , Pb and Mn (ranging from 0.500 to 0.900), contributed approximately 49.181% to the groundwater quality, indicating that most of the groundwater pollution in this study area resulted from the leachate leakage of the MSW landfill, similar to the substantial studies that demonstrated that the main influential groundwater pollutants from landfills included Cl − , SO 4 2− , total hardness, TDS and trace metals [34][35][36][37][38]. The TDS of this landfill was mainly determined by Cl − and SO 4 2− ; therefore, Cl − was very mobile and generally constituted nonreactive tracers, as seen in Figure 6e [18], and SO 4 2− underwent far-reaching biochemical transformations [19].…”
Section: Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Four factors were extracted to represent the main factors for groundwater quality, and to identify the different pollution sources. The first factor, with the principal components of total hardness, Cl − and TDS (greater than 0.900) and the secondary components of SO 4 2− , Pb and Mn (ranging from 0.500 to 0.900), contributed approximately 49.181% to the groundwater quality, indicating that most of the groundwater pollution in this study area resulted from the leachate leakage of the MSW landfill, similar to the substantial studies that demonstrated that the main influential groundwater pollutants from landfills included Cl − , SO 4 2− , total hardness, TDS and trace metals [34][35][36][37][38]. The TDS of this landfill was mainly determined by Cl − and SO 4 2− ; therefore, Cl − was very mobile and generally constituted nonreactive tracers, as seen in Figure 6e [18], and SO 4 2− underwent far-reaching biochemical transformations [19].…”
Section: Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…From the above particle size distribution curves for 5 sands, it reaches 90% of cumulative undersize passing through mesh screen between 400 and 500 microns. The authors can conclude that the predominant size of the studied sands is between 400 microns and 500 microns, which attributed it to the class of fine sand [14]. The small particle size of the latter facilitates the fixation of the organic material to the surface of adsorbent material which is generally more important when the particle size of the material is low.…”
Section: Fly Ashmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The landfills are identified as important source of groundwater contamination with organic and nonorganic pollutants (Fatta et al, 2002;Li et al, 2008;Alslaibi et al, 2011;Regadío et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014). The aquafer contamination with leachate is serious environmental issue not only in developing countries, for example Morocco (Smahi et al, 2013), Malaysia (Zawawia et al, 2012), India (Gunjan et al, 2012), but also in the USA where approximately 75% of the landfills have negative impact on groundwater quality (Jones-Lee & Lee, 1993). Similar results are found in Denmark and other countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%