2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the invariance and discriminant power of morphological features under geometric transformations for breast tumor classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roundness was calculated using the formula: 4π × surface area/perimeter². Concavity was calculated indirectly from the measured convex closure area: (convex closure area – surface area)/convex closure area ( 24 ). Thirty cases were randomly selected from the enrolled population before assignment, and the repeatability of feature extraction was assessed using intra-observer and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roundness was calculated using the formula: 4π × surface area/perimeter². Concavity was calculated indirectly from the measured convex closure area: (convex closure area – surface area)/convex closure area ( 24 ). Thirty cases were randomly selected from the enrolled population before assignment, and the repeatability of feature extraction was assessed using intra-observer and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gómez-Flores and Hernández-López [50] proposed a CAD which helped radiologists to classify breast cancer. The proposed CAD is based on 39 morphological features which describe breast tumor shapes to distinguish whether they are benign or malignant tumors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first classifier was based on shape parameters. In this case, the following 15 morphological features were determined based on the mass boundary outlines: depth-to-width ratio, mass area, circularity, roundness, normalized residual value, overlap ratio, convexity, orientation, long axis to short axis ratio, elliptic normalized skeleton, elliptic normalized circumference, mean of normalized radial length (NRL), standard deviation of NRL, area ratio and contour roughness [3], [10], [11]. The second classifier was trained with the texture features calculated using the gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) technique.…”
Section: B Standard Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%