2017
DOI: 10.1177/0958305x17716947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the potential for developing combined wind-wave projects in the European nearshore

Abstract: The objective of this work is to assess the synergy of the marine resources in the vicinity of several European offshore sites, in order to analyze the viability of the combined wind-wave renewable projects. The reference sites considered for evaluation are located in the vicinity of the European coasts, being already taken into account for various marine projects. As a first step, based on the dataset provided by the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts for the 10-year interval 2005–2014, it was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cut-off distribution the percentage located below these values (3 m/s in this case) was evaluated, during which the turbine would not generate electricity. For the rated capacity, the interval between the rated wind speed (12.5 m/s in this case) and the cut-off value was considered, which for most important offshore wind turbines are set to 25 m/s [76]. During this period, the wind generator will report the best performances in terms of electricity output.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cut-off distribution the percentage located below these values (3 m/s in this case) was evaluated, during which the turbine would not generate electricity. For the rated capacity, the interval between the rated wind speed (12.5 m/s in this case) and the cut-off value was considered, which for most important offshore wind turbines are set to 25 m/s [76]. During this period, the wind generator will report the best performances in terms of electricity output.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Since most of the turbines operate at a hub height of at least 80 m, the initial ERA-Interim wind conditions were adjusted to this reference level throughout a logarithmic law [18][19][20]. For this work, the time interval located between 1.01.1998 and 31.12.2017 will be considered for evaluation.…”
Section: Case Study 2 -Wind Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different developed marine renewable technologies, marine wind energy is the most mature type as regards technological development, commercialization, policy frameworks, and installed capacity (Soukissian et al, 2017;Agora Energiewende and Sandbag, 2018). Actually, most of the interest is focused on the development of new offshore solutions, such as wind turbines with larger rotors, deep water sites and floating platform (e.g., Hywind Scotland project www.statoil.com) (Onea et al, 2017). Floating technology can be considered in fact, as a commercially viable solution in order to harness available wind resource also at greater depth (>50 m) where the conventional fixed offshore wind turbines are no more economically feasible (McMillan and Ault, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of combining a floating wind turbine and a wave energy converters has been already investigated by several authors (Fusco et al, 2010;Iglesias, 2013, 2015;Veigas et al, 2014a,b;Gao et al, 2016;Karimirad and Koushan, 2016). wind-wave technology is a viable solution to reduce the intermittence of the wind and wave resources regardless of the time interval, increasing in this way the attractiveness of a site in terms of its overall marine energy potential (Fusco et al, 2010;Azzellino et al, 2013a;Perez-Collazo et al, 2013;Onea et al, 2017). Therefore, the diversification of the mixed renewable energy technologies, determines a reduction of the power's variability (Fusco et al, 2010;Stoutenburg et al, 2010) and the energy costs Iglesias, 2016, 2017;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%