2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02640.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Short‐Form Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ‐12) following Surgical Placement of Prolift+M: A Transvaginal Partially Absorbable Mesh System for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reference group ceiling effects were found only on the physical subscale. This has previously also been demonstrated in patients [ 29 ]. After treatment the physical subscale showed ceiling effects, while the other subscales did not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the reference group ceiling effects were found only on the physical subscale. This has previously also been demonstrated in patients [ 29 ]. After treatment the physical subscale showed ceiling effects, while the other subscales did not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In recent years, pelvic reconstructive surgeries, based on the pelvic integral theory, have become an important intervention in the surgical treatment of POP . Numerous studies focused on the clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients receiving reconstructive surgeries . However, the change of the PFM function after surgical interventions was seldom reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floor or ceiling effect was reported for only five patient-reported outcomes (the ABI, 58 ePAQ-PF, 38,53 PISQ-12, 52 PISQ-IR, 24 and SPS-Q 22 ). The minimal clinical important difference was reported for only seven patient-reported outcomes: the APFQ POP domain (minimal clinical important difference 1.0 using an a priori value and anchor-based methods), 13,15 the EQ-5 (minimal clinical important difference 0.025 through anchor and distribution based), 35 all domains of the PFDI-20 (minimal clinical important difference 13.5, 24, and 45 through anchor and distribution based), 19,39,59 PFIQ-7 (minimal clinical important difference 36 through anchor based), 19 PISQ (minimal clinical important difference 6 through anchor based), 43 PISQ-IR (minimal clinical important difference 0.3 through anchor and distribution based), 48 and SF-6 (minimal clinical important difference 0.026 through anchor and distribution based).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFDI had the highest number of different publications at 18 total across all versions: five for the original PFDI, 1,20,21,40,60 two for the PFDI-bulge question only, 18,61 and 11 for the PFDI-20. 17,19,23,[29][30][31]34,37,39,59,61 The PISQ had 14 total across all versions: two for the original PISQ, 2,43 seven for the PISQ-12, 12,31,40,44,45,50,52 and five for the PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised). 24,48,51,63 The PFIQ (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire) had 10 total across all versions: four for the original PFIQ 1,20,40,60 and six for the PFIQ-7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%