1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00986.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the quality of restorations

Abstract: Most assessments of the quality of restorations are entirely subjective and involve standard clinical diagnostic equipment. However in recent years there has been an increasing demand for more accurate and reliable methods. Attempts to achieve these have been directed mainly towards the standardization of clinical judgements by the provision of various systems of guidelines of criteria upon which to base them. While these have improved the usefulness of the assessments, they have remained largely subjective. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
7

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
14
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 Calibration of the single assessor was carried out and several cases were scored by a consultant in restorative dentistry to ensure correct application of the criteria. Modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria [31][32][33] were used (Table 1) and the data was entered on a spreadsheet run by the software Statistical Programme for Social Sciences (SPSS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Calibration of the single assessor was carried out and several cases were scored by a consultant in restorative dentistry to ensure correct application of the criteria. Modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria [31][32][33] were used (Table 1) and the data was entered on a spreadsheet run by the software Statistical Programme for Social Sciences (SPSS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a categorical scale was used in the present study, the principle o( ranking impressions should be identical with ranking photographs. The disadvantage of using rating scales is that considerable variation in ratings for the same restorations may be given by different assessors (55,56). Some investigators therefore consider measuring the degree of conformity in classifying each restoration unnecessarily rigorous for validating a method or measuring the interexaminer agreement (57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were easily retrievable from the Health Management Information System (HMIS). It is known that proper treatment planning, restorative treatment decisions and procedures and good filling materials are fundamental for a lasting filling (Elderton, 1977). Repeat cycles of restoration (filling) can ultimately lead to tooth mortality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%