2014
DOI: 10.1002/mus.24229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the rate of force development scaling factor for the hip muscles

Abstract: Hip adductor, flexor, and external rotator RFD-SF can be evaluated with confidence, provided the analysis is modified for external rotators, whereas hip abductor and internal rotator RFD-SF assessment is not recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the key points of this narrative review is that rapid muscle activation—likely through the critical role of MU discharge rate—may be considered as the main determinant of RFD in the early phase of the contraction (first 50–75 ms). Thus, changes in early-phase RFD estimates associated with fatigue, training or detraining have the potential to be used as a surrogate for neural function when techniques such as EMG and twitch interpolation are not implementable, e.g., for the evaluation of specific muscle groups (such as those around the hip) (Casartelli et al 2014 ), in the applied/clinical setting. Another important point developed in our present article deals with the effectiveness of explosive-type and heavy-resistance strength training to improve the earlier (through an improvement in rapid muscle activation) and later rise in force, respectively, which have crucial implications for designing successful training and rehabilitation programs for athletes, elderly individuals and patients with different pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the key points of this narrative review is that rapid muscle activation—likely through the critical role of MU discharge rate—may be considered as the main determinant of RFD in the early phase of the contraction (first 50–75 ms). Thus, changes in early-phase RFD estimates associated with fatigue, training or detraining have the potential to be used as a surrogate for neural function when techniques such as EMG and twitch interpolation are not implementable, e.g., for the evaluation of specific muscle groups (such as those around the hip) (Casartelli et al 2014 ), in the applied/clinical setting. Another important point developed in our present article deals with the effectiveness of explosive-type and heavy-resistance strength training to improve the earlier (through an improvement in rapid muscle activation) and later rise in force, respectively, which have crucial implications for designing successful training and rehabilitation programs for athletes, elderly individuals and patients with different pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller epochs will be more sensitive to changes in the slope of the curve, but also more sensitive to unsystematic variability and thus less reliable, so thought should be given to the purpose of the measure (e.g., relevance to a functional action or physiological mechanism) before selecting an epoch. Nevertheless, peak RFD is a single metric at an inconsistent point on the force–time curve—except for brief impulse-like ballistic contractions (Bellumori et al 2011 ; Casartelli et al 2014 ; Klass et al 2008 ; Van Cutsem et al 1998 )—and thus provides a less comprehensive and standardised measure than RFD or impulse over set time periods.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations: Rfd Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaling is attributed to increasing rates of neural activation with increase force (10,19,25,45). Derived from RFD and peak force (PF) measures from numerous force pulses performed across a wide range of submaximal amplitudes, the slope of the linear RFD-PF relationship has support as a reliable dependent measure (4,7). The slope has been shown to decrease with age (25) or following stroke (10), and it increases with power training (45).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, a protocol usually adopted to calculate the so-called RFD scaling factor (RFD-SF) provides an appealing approach ( Bellumori et al, 2011 , 2013 ; Casartelli et al, 2014 ; Djordjevic and Uygur, 2017 ). The protocol consists in a series of quick and fast (i.e., ballistic) contractions performed with different submaximal amplitudes (namely from 20 to 100% of MVCF) ( Freund and Budingen, 1978 ; Ghez and Vicario, 1978 ; Wierzbicka et al, 1991 ; Klass et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each ballistic contraction the individuals are asked to roughly reach a given submaximal force as fast as possible (the emphasis is on the quickness of the contraction rather than on the accurateness). The RFD measured in each contraction thus quantify the capacity to quickly produce submaximal force ( Bellumori et al, 2011 , 2013 ; Casartelli et al, 2014 ; Djordjevic and Uygur, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%