2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the reliability and validity of imaging measurements for patellofemoral instability: an updated systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X‐ray, computed tomography (CT) scans remain a standardized radiographic tool to assess and quantify patellofemoral alignment, showing good reliability [1, 11, 27, 48]. However, insufficient data for cutoff values or thresholds of anatomic factors based on CT images have been reported [18, 42]. Although demographic risk factors (e.g., age and sex) contribute to patellofemoral instability [5, 42], few previous studies have assessed patellofemoral morphology and anatomic risk factors within pair‐matched groups based on age and sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X‐ray, computed tomography (CT) scans remain a standardized radiographic tool to assess and quantify patellofemoral alignment, showing good reliability [1, 11, 27, 48]. However, insufficient data for cutoff values or thresholds of anatomic factors based on CT images have been reported [18, 42]. Although demographic risk factors (e.g., age and sex) contribute to patellofemoral instability [5, 42], few previous studies have assessed patellofemoral morphology and anatomic risk factors within pair‐matched groups based on age and sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear depth, and sulcus angle show good intra- and interobserver agreement. 20 Trochlear facet asymmetry, in contrast, shows poor to good intraobserver agreement. 20…”
Section: Anatomical Factors Predisposing To Patellar Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The ideal imaging modality for each measurement is unknown, and the utility of originally described cutoff values across imaging modalities has not been validated. 13,36 On MRI scans, measurements utilizing bony versus cartilaginous landmarks are often performed interchangeably, despite evidence that they may differ in the evaluation of trochlear dysplasia. 33 Trochlear dysplasia has been more commonly reported in female patients, suggesting that increased anatomic risk factors may account for sex-specific differences in patellar instability.…”
Section: -In-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The ideal imaging modality for each measurement is unknown, and the utility of originally described cutoff values across imaging modalities has not been validated. 13,36 On MRI scans, measurements utilizing bony versus cartilaginous landmarks are often performed interchangeably, despite evidence that they may differ in the evaluation of trochlear dysplasia. 33…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%