Assessment of the requisites of microbiology based infectious disease training under the pressure of consultation needs

Self Cite

Infective endocarditis is a growing problem with many shifts due to ever-increasing comorbid illnesses, invasive procedures, and increase in the elderly. We performed this multinational study to depict definite infective endocarditis. Adult patients with definite endocarditis hospitalized between January 1, 2015, and October 1, 2018, were included from 41 hospitals in 13 countries. We included microbiological features, types and severity of the disease, complications, but excluded therapeutic parameters. A total of 867 patients were included. A total of 631 (72.8%) patients had native valve endocarditis (NVE), 214 (24.7%) patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), 21 (2.4%) patients had pacemaker lead endocarditis, and 1 patient had catheter port endocarditis. Eighteen percent of NVE patients were hospital-acquired. PVE patients were classified as early-onset in 24.9%. A total of 385 (44.4%) patients had major embolic events, most frequently to the brain (n = 227, 26.3%). Blood cultures yielded pathogens in 766 (88.4%). In 101 (11.6%) patients, blood cultures were negative. Molecular testing of vegetations disclosed pathogens in 65 cases. Overall, 795 (91.7%) endocarditis patients had any identified pathogen. Leading pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus (n = 267, 33.6%), Streptococcus viridans (n = 149, 18.7%), enterococci (n = 128, 16.1%), coagulasenegative staphylococci (n = 92, 11.6%)) displayed substantial resistance profiles. A total of 132 (15.2%) patients had cardiac abscesses; 693 (79.9%) patients had left-sided endocarditis. Aortic (n = 394, 45.4%) and mitral valves (n = 369, 42.5%) were most frequently involved. Mortality was more common in PVE than NVE (NVE (n = 101, 16%), PVE (n = 49, 22.9%), p = 0.042). a Including all NVE, PVE, pacemaker, and catheter port endocarditis patients. b N indicates the denominator with any identified pathogen. c Coxiella burnetii seropositivity; anti-phase 1 IgG antibody titer ≥ 1:800 A P value of <0.05 was considered significant Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 54%

“…Vegetation was not shown in 54 (6.2%) patients. A total of 893 cardiac vegetations in accordance with definite IE were observed in 810 (93.4%) patients ((NVE = 595, 73.5%), (PVE = 193,23.8%), (pacemaker lead IE = 21, 2.6%; 5 with NVE, 4 with PVE, and 21 alone), (catheter port IE = 1, 0.1%)). There were multiple vegetations in 81 (9.4%) patients.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Portraying infective endocarditis: results of multinational ID-IRI study

Erdem¹,

Puca

Ruch

et al. 2019

Self Cite

“…In addition, 45 (24.3 %) of 185 patients we recruited had diabetes and 26 (14.1 %) had COPD, both of which are known to facilitate infections [20,21]. An older age and the presence of comorbid conditions may have the potential to increase the severity of infections [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Infections in travellers returning to Turkey from the Arabian peninsula: a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study

Erdem

Elaldı

et al. 2016

Mass gatherings pooling people from different parts of the world-the largest of which is to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, for Hajj-may impose risks for acquisition and dissemination of infectious diseases. A substantial number of pilgrims to Hajj and Umrah are Turkish citizens (456,000 in 2014) but data are lacking on scale of the problem. We did a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study in Turkey to explore the range of infections among inpatients who had recently returned from the Arabian Peninsula. Our inclusion criteria were patients who had acquired an infection during their trip to an Arabian Peninsula country, or who became symptomatic within 1 week of their return. The data were collected retrospectively for January 1, 2013 and March 1, 2015. 185 Turkish patients were recruited to the study across 15 referral centers with travel associated infectious diseases after returning from Arabian Peninsula countries (predominantly Saudi Arabia 163 [88.1 %] for religious purposes 162 [87.5 %]). Seventy four (40.0 %) of them were ≥ 65 years old with numerous comorbidities including diabetes (24.3 %) and COPD (14.1 %). The most common clinical diagnosis was respiratory tract infections (169 [91.5 %]), followed by diarrheal diseases (13 [7 %]), and there was one case of MERS-CoV. Patients spent a median of 5 (3-7) days as hospital inpatients and overall mortality was 1.1 %. Returning travellers from the Arabian Peninsula present as inpatients with a broad range of infectious diseases similar to common community acquired infections frequently seen in daily medical practices in Turkey.

“…On the other hand, the presence of microbiology laboratories in Turkish ID wards was more common than in the French ID wards. The probable reason for this was that the ID specialization was established on internal medicine training followed by ID fellowship in France [2], while Turkish specialists have a training based on integrated clinical microbiology and ID [3]. Although a central microbiology laboratory existed inside the hospitals, Turkish ID physicians preferred to perform basic and rapid tests like stains, direct microscopy, and agglutination tests in their own laboratories to prevent delays.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The features of infectious diseases departments and anti-infective practices in France and Turkey: a cross-sectional study

Erdem

Stahl

İnan

et al. 2014

The aim of this study was to assess the infectious diseases (ID) wards of tertiary hospitals in France and Turkey for technical capacity, infection control, characteristics of patients, infections, infecting organisms, and therapeutic approaches. This cross-sectional study was carried out on a single day on one of the weekdays of June 17-21, 2013. Overall, 36 ID departments from Turkey (n = 21) and France (n = 15) were involved. On the study day, 273 patients were hospitalized in Turkish and 324 patients were followed in French ID departments. The numbers of patients and beds in the hospitals, and presence of an intensive care unit (ICU) room in the ID ward was not different in both France and Turkey. Bed occupancy in the ID ward, single rooms, and negative pressure rooms were significantly higher in France. The presence of a laboratory inside the ID ward was more common in Turkish ID wards. The configuration of infection control committees, and their qualifications and surveillance types were quite similar in both countries. Although differences existed based on epidemiology, the distribution of infections were uniform on both sides. In Turkey, anti-Gram-positive agents, carbapenems, and tigecycline, and in France, cephalosporins, penicillins, aminoglycosides, and metronidazole were more frequently preferred. Enteric Gram-negatives and hepatitis B and C were more frequent in Turkey, while human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and streptococci were more common in France (p < 0.05 for all significances). Various differences and similarities existed in France and Turkey in the ID wards. However, the current scene is that ID are managed with high standards in both countries.