2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the results of the pendulum friction tester (EN 14231) for natural building stones used as floor-coverings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a decrease to 22 units for polished tiles, indicating that the floor poses a very high risk of slipping under these conditions. The SRV results obtained under dry conditions corresponded with the study of Karaca et al [24], who obtained SRV values ranging from 42 to 74 units for granite slabs with slightly lower roughness than those tested in this study. In contrast, the slip resistance value determined in this study under wet conditions was significantly more favorable.…”
Section: Slip Resistance Valuesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was a decrease to 22 units for polished tiles, indicating that the floor poses a very high risk of slipping under these conditions. The SRV results obtained under dry conditions corresponded with the study of Karaca et al [24], who obtained SRV values ranging from 42 to 74 units for granite slabs with slightly lower roughness than those tested in this study. In contrast, the slip resistance value determined in this study under wet conditions was significantly more favorable.…”
Section: Slip Resistance Valuesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For the purpose of increasing the interface roughness, grooves were made on the surface at different intervals to increase the interface friction. The pendulum friction tester was used to determine the British pendulum number (BPN) value of the specimen surface in the direction of the groove (Karaca et al, 2013). For this test, a condition with temperature of 25 • C, no moisture immersion, tack coat of modified emulsified asphalt, spreading amount of 0.5 kg/m 2 , and no grooving was used as the benchmark test condition.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pixel values represent the distance or depth into the coating. Roughness parameter Ra (pixels) was subsequently calculated from the roughness profiles with Equation (2) [56]:…”
Section: Slip Resistance (Standard En-14231) and Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%