2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Role of IQ in Associations Between Population Density and Deprivation and Nonaffective Psychosis

Abstract: Being born or raised in more densely populated or deprived areas is associated with increased risk of nonaffective psychosis in adulthood, but few studies to date have examined the role of general cognitive ability in these associations. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether lower IQ contributed to the association between population density or deprivation and nonaffective psychosis (mediation) and whether these associations were stronger in people with lower IQ (effect modification).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indirect pathway of GPS-intelligence-psychotic-like experiences aligns with the recent findings of the ABCD study reporting the associations between educational attainment GPSs and psychotic-like experiences 16 . Our study is a step forward in that the magnitude of the genetic effect was compared with those of key environmental factors 53 . Additionally, genetic data from the large epidemiological samples and a wide spectrum of the environmental and socioeconomic status allowed for unbiased testing of the relationships among the multimodal variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect pathway of GPS-intelligence-psychotic-like experiences aligns with the recent findings of the ABCD study reporting the associations between educational attainment GPSs and psychotic-like experiences 16 . Our study is a step forward in that the magnitude of the genetic effect was compared with those of key environmental factors 53 . Additionally, genetic data from the large epidemiological samples and a wide spectrum of the environmental and socioeconomic status allowed for unbiased testing of the relationships among the multimodal variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge that neighborhood-level factors -here, specifically deprivation -could influence the age-atfirst-diagnosis of psychosis could help inform the allocation of resources to support timely access to early intervention programs for people in their first episode of psychosis. Given our research has also shown that a disproportionate burden of new cases will present in more deprived areas, 32,50 mental health policymakers should prioritize resourcing appropriate psychosis services in these areas. Our data suggest this should include provision of early detection and outreach strategies in more deprived communities to minimize delays to care, and maximize positive functional, symptomatic, and social outcomes for people in their first episode of psychosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our exposures were neighborhood deprivation and population density at birth. Following similar studies in Sweden, 31,32 we defined neighborhoods according to the "Small Area for Market Statistics" (SAMS) classification system, which contains annual information on residential area characteristics. There are about 9,200 SAMS areas in Sweden, and their median population size in 2011 was 726 people (interquartile range (IQR), 312-1,378).…”
Section: Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However rates of opioid use vary across England, with more deprived regions experiencing greater prevalence compared to less deprived areas(2). Since social deprivation is also strongly associated with risk of several psychiatric disorders, including psychotic disorders (3,4), this raises the possibility of syndemic effects, where the co-occurrence of substance use disorders and mental health disorders in the same population (i.e. a syndemic) or same individuals (co-morbidity or dual diagnoses) share common causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%