Pre-clinical and clinical data indicate differences in the responses of melanoma and carcinoma tumours to electrochemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the origin of this difference, whether it is due to the intrinsic difference in tumour cell susceptibility to the chemotherapeutic, or due to the tumour micro-environment. For this purpose, we performed a pre-clinical study in B16F1 melanoma and TS/A carcinoma tumours in mice, in which the antitumour effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with bleomycin, the intrinsic sensitivity of tumour cells in vitro, the pharmacokinetics of bleomycin in plasma and tumours, and the vascularization of tumours in vivo were evaluated. The results of the treatment show that carcinoma was significantly more responsive to electrochemotherapy than melanoma. This effect cannot be ascribed to the intrinsic sensitivity of these cells, as melanoma cells were more sensitive than carcinoma cells in vitro. The difference in responses could be ascribed to differences in the pharmacokinetics of bleomycin; at the time of electroporation in carcinomas, more bleomycin was accumulated. This effect could be due to differences in tumour vascularization, as carcinoma tumours had numerous well-distributed, small blood vessels, while melanomas were less vascularized, exhibiting predominantly larger vessels. In conclusion, this study provides evidence on the importance of the tumour micro-environment, particularly the tumour vasculature, in the responses of the tumours to bleomycin electrochemotherapy. Vasculature is important for the pharmacokinetics of bleomycin, influencing drug accumulation and drug distribution in tumours, and might be used as a predictive factor for the tumour response to electrochemotherapy.