2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the urban waterlogging resilience and identification of its driving factors: A case study of Wuhan City, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lei et al [52] found that floods and extreme precipitation would cause a certain degree of damage to buildings. Water conservancy facilities (such as dams and embankments) and riverside buildings would need to be strengthened in the future to prevent serious city and farmland waterlogging [10,48,49]. In Figure 10e, the eastern-southern Haihe River Basin is characterized by plains covered with farmland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lei et al [52] found that floods and extreme precipitation would cause a certain degree of damage to buildings. Water conservancy facilities (such as dams and embankments) and riverside buildings would need to be strengthened in the future to prevent serious city and farmland waterlogging [10,48,49]. In Figure 10e, the eastern-southern Haihe River Basin is characterized by plains covered with farmland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…waterlogging [10,48,49]. In Figure 10e, the eastern-southern Haihe River Basin is characterized by plains covered with farmland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The selection of the assessment indicators is the basis of water risk assessment. A rational indicator system is expected to contain features of a dynamic bidirectional transmission mechanism and feedback besides assuring the broad coverage of indicators [43]. As a well-accepted method to assess resilience, the PSR framework [44] not only has obvious advantages in reflecting dynamic assessment processes [45,46] but also has conceptual coherence with the substance of risk-a product of the combination of a risk source and a risk-bearing entity [25].…”
Section: Indicator Selection and Standard Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%