2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity model in transitional boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Note that there is no distinction between and in the computation of laminar flow because LES is essentially DNS in this case (Kim et al. 2019, 2020). The residual part is a turbulence fluctuation, so in the pre-transition region where the deterministic disturbance (see (2.1)) is well resolved with the current fine grid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… Note that there is no distinction between and in the computation of laminar flow because LES is essentially DNS in this case (Kim et al. 2019, 2020). The residual part is a turbulence fluctuation, so in the pre-transition region where the deterministic disturbance (see (2.1)) is well resolved with the current fine grid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model coefficient is as suggested in Nicoud & Ducros (1999) and tested in the transitional boundary layer in Kim et al. (2019, 2020). The sub-grid-scale turbulence model is judiciously chosen for wall-resolved LES in the transitional boundary layer (Kim et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations