2011
DOI: 10.2172/1030888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Tidal Energy Removal Impacts on Physical Systems: Development of MHK Module and Analysis of Effects on Hydrodynamics

Abstract: In this report we describe 1) the development, test, and validation of the marine hydrokinetic energy scheme in a three-dimensional coastal ocean model (FVCOM); and 2) the sensitivity analysis of effects of marine hydrokinetic energy configurations on power extraction and volume flux in a coastal bay. Submittal of this report completes the work on Task 2. Project OverviewEnergy generated from the world's oceans and rivers offers the potential to make substantial contributions to the domestic and global renewa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies and reviews address the recoverable hydrokinetic resource in tidal settings (e.g., Couch and Bryden 2004, Garrett and Cummins 2005, Bryden and Couch 2006, EPRI 2006, Garrett and Cummins 2007, Lunden and Bahaj 2007, Sutherland et al 2007, Blanchfield et al 2008, Garrett and Cummins 2008, Karsten et al 2008, Polagye et al 2008, Sun et al 2008, Walkington and Burrows 2009, Atwater and Lawrence 2010, Shapiro 2010, Defne et al 2011, Yang and Wang 2011; however, there is no known, definitive study published on the recoverable river in-stream hydrokinetic resource other than the 1986 study by Miller et al Ortgega-Achury et al (2010) specifically addressed riverine hydrokinetics as well as other hydrokinetic technologies, but focused on the hydraulic and environmental consequences of turbine deployment rather than on the amount of recoverable energy in rivers.…”
Section: Section 3: Results For Theoretically Available Hydrokinetic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies and reviews address the recoverable hydrokinetic resource in tidal settings (e.g., Couch and Bryden 2004, Garrett and Cummins 2005, Bryden and Couch 2006, EPRI 2006, Garrett and Cummins 2007, Lunden and Bahaj 2007, Sutherland et al 2007, Blanchfield et al 2008, Garrett and Cummins 2008, Karsten et al 2008, Polagye et al 2008, Sun et al 2008, Walkington and Burrows 2009, Atwater and Lawrence 2010, Shapiro 2010, Defne et al 2011, Yang and Wang 2011; however, there is no known, definitive study published on the recoverable river in-stream hydrokinetic resource other than the 1986 study by Miller et al Ortgega-Achury et al (2010) specifically addressed riverine hydrokinetics as well as other hydrokinetic technologies, but focused on the hydraulic and environmental consequences of turbine deployment rather than on the amount of recoverable energy in rivers.…”
Section: Section 3: Results For Theoretically Available Hydrokinetic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those include increased nutrient loads transported into the sea by rivers (such as fertilizer run-off from agriculture), sewage, aquaculture, and mussel farming sites. The influence of such additions can be exacerbated through slower or less pronounced flushing of coastal areas or inlets after introduction of structures that slow down or prevent water movement, like a large array of TEDs [20]. In the idealised model presented here, residence time increased by 5% under the TED array scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews have discussed the potential local ecological effects [5][6][7][8][9] focusing largely on sediment dynamics [10,11], collision risks with mammals [12,13], fish or seabirds [14][15][16], and changes in larger community structures [17,18]. The installation of a large TED array will change the hydrodynamics of the ambient flow [19,20]. Many sessile and sedentary organisms depend on the flow of the water for availability of nutrients and food and hence changes in the hydrodynamics due to the presence of tidal turbines could potentially reduce the growth and ultimately survival of these organisms [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flushing of a basin (Yang and Wang 2011). In the idealised model residence time increased by 5% under the TED array scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of review studies discuss the potential local ecological effects (Boehlert and Gill 2010, Kadiri et al 2012, Maclean et al 2014, Shields et al 2011, Shields and Payne 2014, focussing largely on sediment dynamics (Martin-Short et al 2015, Neill et al 2009), collision risks with mammals (Thompson et al 2013), fish or seabirds Ehnberg 2013, 30 Hammar et al 2015) and changes in larger community structures (Adams et al 2014, Kregting et al In review). The installation of a TED array will change the hydrodynamics of the ambient flow Bryden 2007, Yang andWang 2011). Many sessile and sedentary organisms depend on the flow of the water for availability of nutrients and food and hence changes in the hydrodynamics due to the presence of tidal turbines could potentially reduce the growth and ultimately survival of these organisms (Shields et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%