2013
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2013.2259792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Two SMOS Sea Surface Salinity Level 3 Products Against Argo Upper Salinity Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al . [] compared two SMOS products (BEC L3 and CATDS V02) with Argo measurements and showed that both products perform well in the open low‐latitude oceans; but close to coasts and in higher latitudes the biases were high. The reasons for using the BEC L4 product in the present study are, on the one hand, the availability of data in the study period and, on the other hand, that frontal structures are potentially better taken into account, which is of special importance in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al . [] compared two SMOS products (BEC L3 and CATDS V02) with Argo measurements and showed that both products perform well in the open low‐latitude oceans; but close to coasts and in higher latitudes the biases were high. The reasons for using the BEC L4 product in the present study are, on the one hand, the availability of data in the study period and, on the other hand, that frontal structures are potentially better taken into account, which is of special importance in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of satellite products were primarily assessed through comparisons between the RMSD of satellite products with respect to in situ data (Bao et al, 2019;Garcia-Eidell et al, 2017;H. Y. Kao et al, 2018;Köhler et al, 2015;Ratheesh et al, 2013;Wenqing Tang et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous assessment studies mainly focused on the accuracy of satellite products. The quality of satellite products was primarily assessed through comparisons between the RMSD of satellite products with respect to in situ data (Bao et al., 2019; Garcia‐Eidell et al., 2017; Kao et al., 2018; Köhler et al., 2015; Ratheesh et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2013). However, there are only a few studies on the ability of SSS satellite data to depict oceanic phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) [18] satellite was launched in 2009 and remains ongoing. Although satellites can provide abundant SSS data, the observations contain large errors and cannot be directly applied to the assimilation system used in coastal areas (such as the China Sea and Japan Sea) or at high latitudes [16,17,[19][20][21]. Among the previous studies, Kohl et al [17] compared the SMOS dataset produced by the University of Hamburg based on the reprocessed ESA's L2 product (Version 5.50) with EN3 v2a data and they found that the root mean square error (RMSE) is typically approximately 1 g/kg but can reach 3 g/kg in a few locations in the coastal regions and at high latitudes.…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%