2015
DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.086-093.oar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of upper airways measurements in patients with mandibular skeletal Class II malocclusion

Abstract: Objective: Mandibular Class II malocclusions seem to interfere in upper airways measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the upper airways measurements of patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion in order to investigate the association between these measurements and the position and length of the mandible as well as mandibular growth trend, comparing the Class II group with a Class I one. Methods: A total of 80 lateral cephalograms from 80 individuals aged between 10 and 17 years old were assessed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study demonstrate that in patients with skeletal class II, there is a decrease in the size of the upper airways compared to patients with class I and III. (Silva, Lacerda, Silva, & Ramos, 2015) These results are consistent with other studies in this area (M Kirjavainen; & Turkka, 2007), but a direct link only between this skeletal abnormality and sleep apnea cannot be deduced, even though it has been shown that a decrease in mandibular body length was found in patients with OSA (Joanna, Johal, & Kotecha 2000). Mandibular advancement alone is unlikely to be succesfull (Anaesth, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results of the present study demonstrate that in patients with skeletal class II, there is a decrease in the size of the upper airways compared to patients with class I and III. (Silva, Lacerda, Silva, & Ramos, 2015) These results are consistent with other studies in this area (M Kirjavainen; & Turkka, 2007), but a direct link only between this skeletal abnormality and sleep apnea cannot be deduced, even though it has been shown that a decrease in mandibular body length was found in patients with OSA (Joanna, Johal, & Kotecha 2000). Mandibular advancement alone is unlikely to be succesfull (Anaesth, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some cephalometric values are related to an increase or decrease in mandibular angles, sagittal differences in the maxilla and mandible, and differences in facial height, involving functional changes in the oral and nasal systems [ 6 ] together with occlusal alterations [ 7 ]. Furthermore, changes in the airway can also be observed with these morphological characteristics [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some researchers have described the malpositioning of both the maxilla and mandible in this condition (Drelich, 1948;Lau & Hägg, 1999;Al-Khateeb & Al-Khateeb, 2009). Likewise, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the relationship between Class II-1 malocclusion and upper-airway dimensions, where some investigators suggested Class II-1 malocclusion may have an influence on the upper-airway dimensions (Mergen & Jacobs, 1970;Silva et al, 2015;Soni et al, 2015) while other authors did not find a significant correlation between the two (Sosa, Graber & Muller, 1982;Ceylan & Oktay, 1995;Bollhalder et al, 2013). Further, a number of tooth-size studies have investigated Class II-1 malocclusion; their results were also contradictory, with some reporting significant differences in tooth-size ratios between Class II-1 malocclusion and Class I malocclusion or normal occlusion (Fattahi, Pakshir & Hedayati, 2006;Wędrychowska-Szulc, Janiszewska-Olszowska & Stepie n, 2010;Mollabashi et al, 2019) and others indicating no significant differences in this regard (Crosby & Alexander, 1989;Oktay & Ulukaya, 2010;Machado et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%