2016
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2016.62017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Used Formulae for Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight in Sudanese Population

Abstract: The objective of this study is to assess commonly used formulae (Sheppard, Campbell, Hadlock I, II, III, and IV) for estimation of fetal weight in Sudanese population. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Saudi Hospital-Khartoum-Sudan; from December 2015 to April 2016. The study included 225 singleton pregnancies. The fetal biometry-Biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL) and actual birth weights (ABW) were taken. Statistical analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BPD, HC, AC, FL, and actual birth weights (ABW) were also taken in Sudan by Caroline Edward Ayad in her study of "Assessment of Used Formulae for Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight in Sudanese Population." This statistical analysis showed significant results at p ≤ 0.005 [12], [19], [20]. In other words, the study conducted by Caroline in Sudan is concrete evidence of a correlation between fetal biometry and LMP on fetal growth, as we have also done this study on pregnancy in Indonesia especially Minangkabau ethnic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BPD, HC, AC, FL, and actual birth weights (ABW) were also taken in Sudan by Caroline Edward Ayad in her study of "Assessment of Used Formulae for Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight in Sudanese Population." This statistical analysis showed significant results at p ≤ 0.005 [12], [19], [20]. In other words, the study conducted by Caroline in Sudan is concrete evidence of a correlation between fetal biometry and LMP on fetal growth, as we have also done this study on pregnancy in Indonesia especially Minangkabau ethnic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the study of Al Marri et al, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the means BPD values for each week of GA show growth of BPD values at every level of its week; even though the differences with the BPD values of USA, Norway, Australia, Zimbabwe, India, China, and Malaysia are not really significant. Thus, these new BPD values made by Al marri are highly recommended to be used by the medical practitioner as the reference range of fetal biometry for Saudi Arabia population, in regards to provide a better healthcare and well-being of the maternal and fetuses [17], [18], [19], [20]. In accordance with Al Marri's study in determining the new BPD variable in Saudi Arabia, this study is also an attempt to create a new standard and the value of the new BPD variable that can be used by practitioners in Indonesia especially in the Minangkabaru Ethnic, in determining fetal growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1996 ) and Shepard et al. ( 1982 ) formulas (Table 2 ), were selected for comparative analysis based on their widespread usage and previous validation in human populations (Abele et al., 2010 ; Ayad et al., 2016 ; Chaudhury et al., 2010 ; Dakwar Shaheen et al., 2019 ; Hiwale et al., 2019 ; Hoopmann, Abele et al., 2010 ; Hoopmann, Bernau et al., 2010 ; Schild et al., 2004 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eleven valid and commonly utilized EFW formulas, such as Campbell and Wilkin (1975), Combs et al (1993), Hadlock (I, II, III, IV, V, VI) (Hadlock et al, 1984(Hadlock et al, , 1985, Ott et al (1986), Scott et al (1996) and Shepard et al (1982) formulas (Table 2), were selected for comparative analysis based on their widespread usage and previous validation in human populations (Abele et al, 2010;Ayad et al, 2016;Chaudhury et al, 2010;Dakwar Shaheen et al, 2019;Hiwale et al, 2019;Hoopmann, Abele et al, 2010;Hoopmann, Bernau et al, 2010;Schild et al, 2004).…”
Section: Estimated Foetal Weight Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%