2020
DOI: 10.5505/yeditepe.2020.60362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation a group of children in the Eastern Black Sea region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study showed that the tooth age determined by the Demirjian method was on average 0.53 ± 1.08 years higher for males and 0.54 ± 1.05 years higher for females. In contrast, with the Willems method, tooth age was 0.03 ± 0.91 years higher for males and 0.03 ± 0.90 years higher for females [34]. In our present study, we found that the Demirjian method overestimated chronological age by 0.52 ± 0.83 years in males and 0.59 ± 0.98 years in females; these differences were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Another study showed that the tooth age determined by the Demirjian method was on average 0.53 ± 1.08 years higher for males and 0.54 ± 1.05 years higher for females. In contrast, with the Willems method, tooth age was 0.03 ± 0.91 years higher for males and 0.03 ± 0.90 years higher for females [34]. In our present study, we found that the Demirjian method overestimated chronological age by 0.52 ± 0.83 years in males and 0.59 ± 0.98 years in females; these differences were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%