2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Variability of Aromatic Rice Using Agro-Morphological Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of phenotypic coefficient of variation for all the traits under study were found to be more than genotypic coefficient of variation and very small difference was present in between genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation revealing very little influence of environment for their expression (Table 2). This finding was in partial consonance with the findings of Bharath et al (2018) [7] , Pragya et al (2018) [8] , Kujur et al (2017) [9] and Rahangdale et al (2019a) [2] . High GCV and PCV were recorded for the traits viz., Stem thickness (25.87%) followed by number of tillers/plant (26.05% & 26.64), number of effective tillers/plant (26.28% & 26.73%), panicle weight per plant, plant weight, biological yield plant, sterile spikelet/panicle, fertile spikelets/panicle, total no.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The values of phenotypic coefficient of variation for all the traits under study were found to be more than genotypic coefficient of variation and very small difference was present in between genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation revealing very little influence of environment for their expression (Table 2). This finding was in partial consonance with the findings of Bharath et al (2018) [7] , Pragya et al (2018) [8] , Kujur et al (2017) [9] and Rahangdale et al (2019a) [2] . High GCV and PCV were recorded for the traits viz., Stem thickness (25.87%) followed by number of tillers/plant (26.05% & 26.64), number of effective tillers/plant (26.28% & 26.73%), panicle weight per plant, plant weight, biological yield plant, sterile spikelet/panicle, fertile spikelets/panicle, total no.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%