2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-015-0269-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of ventilation efficiency for emergency situations in subway systems by CFD modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrated utilization of mechanical and natural ventilation effectively inhibit fire smoke dispersions and decrease toxic substance concentrations [290]. Smoke exhaust systems in tunnels and platforms can operate collaboratively to deal with different situations [291]. Meanwhile, smoke control systems in subways consist of tunnel ventilation fans, under platform exhaust systems, smoke evacuating gates, and platform edge doors.…”
Section: Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated utilization of mechanical and natural ventilation effectively inhibit fire smoke dispersions and decrease toxic substance concentrations [290]. Smoke exhaust systems in tunnels and platforms can operate collaboratively to deal with different situations [291]. Meanwhile, smoke control systems in subways consist of tunnel ventilation fans, under platform exhaust systems, smoke evacuating gates, and platform edge doors.…”
Section: Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xie [10] established a fire risk assessment model for subway operations based on group topologizable fuzzy theory and used fuzzy mathematics and topologizable theory to make a comprehensive assessment of six aspects including fire sources, fire performance, fire extinguishing capability, evacuation capability, safety management situation, and environment in subway stations. Teodosiu [11] studied subway fires from three points of view: fuel content, safety management and evacuation of personnel and passengers, and the safety of train equipment. Fridolf [12] analyzed the main influencing factors of subway fires from 21 categories of personnel, equipment, management, and environment and established a subway fire risk assessment model through neural networks.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with the development of computer science and technology, and numerical methodologies, numerical tools have been a popular way to investigate subway station fires. Many computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models or software, such as FLUENT, and FDS, among others, are widely used in analyzing fire smoke evolution in subway stations and tunnels [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. CFD-based simulations can reproduce well the evolution process of subway station fires if appropriate initial and boundary conditions are implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%