Assessment of vessel-generated waste quantities on the inland waterways of the Republic of Serbia

Waste Management on Board Disney Cruise Line Company Ships

“…The article, through its originality, is meant to add to the understudied topic of cruise ship waste management systems (Letson, Suman, Shivlani, 1998;Johnson, 2002;Morehouse, Koch, 2003;Polglaze, 2003;Butt, 2007;Srinivasan, Swain, 2007;Brida, Zapata, 2010;Burgin, Hardiman, 2011;Ulnikovic et al, 2012;Kizielewicz, Lukovic, 2015;Lasserre, Tetu, 2015;Strazza, Del Borghi, Gallo, Manariti, Missanelli, 2015;Wilewska-Bien, Granhag, Andersson, 2016;Svaetichin, Inkinen, 2017). The present and previous papers contain relevant data sourced from official documents and records, coupled with the contribution of in-house environmental staff, corporate guidelines and field observations that focus on the waste management system put in place on cruise routes and on board the ships.…”

Disney cruise line environmental management. Part I: environmental policy and waste management on cruise itineraries

“…The purpose of this complex paper is to present the cruise ship environmental impact prevention methods, by analysing the environmental policies and the main processes for dealing with the generated gaseous, liquid and solid waste (both along the cruise itineraries and on board); the study will focus on the DCL company, one of the world's leaders in entertainment, also known as one of the most environmentally-friendly players on the market. The article, through its originality, will complement the relatively deficient scientific environmental studies available on this topic (Loehr et al, 2003;Morehouse, Koch, 2003;Srinivasan, Swain, 2007;Burgin, Hardiman, 2011;Ulnikovic et al, 2012;Balaji et al, 2014;Kizielewicz, Lukovic, 2015;Lasserre, Tetu, 2015;Tichavska, Tovar, 2015;Papaefthimiou et al, 2016;Verna, Harris, 2016). The three-piece paper brings important information based on records and regulations introduced to ensure the proper use of the waste management system on both cruise routes and on board the ships, as well as details on the collection circuit, precautionary measures, risk factors, etc.…”

An Adoption of Marpol 73/78 for Managing Ship-Generated Garbage in Laem Chabang Port : A Case of Shipping Collaborations

“…Besides, other preventive means were also recommended by many researchers such as providing the incentive scheme, which can draw the attention of polluters to return their garbage to GRF (Cho, 2009), setting up the reasonable charging price which provides an incentive cost to ship operators (Bateman, 1996;Georgakellos, 2007), enhancing the enforcement of national laws as well as port regulations with reward and penalty that can increase the environmental performance of seaports (Knapp and Franses, 2009;Lam and Notteboom, 2014), sharing critical imformation with seaports so as to increasing the accuracy of plan (Lai, Wong and Lam, 2014 and so on. In spite of a number of studies suggesting how to improve environmental performance in shipping business, there are still many rooms for further developing. The previous studies concentrated on the effect of accumulated ship-generated garbage on the entanglement of marine creature (Vauk and Schrey, 1987;Henderson, 2001;Derraik, 2002;Butt, 2007;Hinojosa and Thiel, 2009;Ng and Song, 2010;Gall and Thompson, 2015;Phillips, 2015), the investigation and assurance of adequacy of GRF at port (Waldichuk, 1973;Olson, 1994;Bateman, 1996;Ball, 1999;Carpenter and Macgill, 2005), the factors affecting the discharge of ship-generated garbage into the sea (Cho, 2009;Chen and Liu, 2013), estimation of the amount of garbage generated onboard (Horsman, 1982, Ulnikovic, Vukic, andNikolic, 2012), the estimation of the amount of ship-generated garbage delivered at GRF (Senarak, 2016) and the development of the policy that convinces ship operators to environmentally-friendly design their ship and management (Cho, 2009;Knapp and Franses, 2009;Chen and Liu 2013;Jaccoud and Magrini 2014;Lam and Notteboom, 2014). Firstly, there is no study exploring the ways to persuade liner shipp...…”

“…A review of literature over the past forty years indicates that a number of studies concentrated on ship-generated garbage in different viewpoints while a very limited attention was paid on the study of operational waste generated from ship. Generally, a series of studies since the early 1970s can be classified into 2 groups: an impact assessment with exploration of cause (Horsman, 1982;Vauk et al, 1987;Laist, 1987;Jones, 1995;Rees et al, 1995;Henderson, 2001;Derraik, 2002;Carpenter et al, 2005;Butt, 2007;Georgakellos, 2007;Cho, 2009;Knapp et al, 2009;Ng et al, 2010), and a study or review on how to cope with ship-originated garbage (Waldichuk, 1973;Olson, 1994;Bateman, 1996;Ball, 1999;Polglaze, 2003;Ulnikovic et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2013).…”

“…In addition to the responsibility of ports in preventing marine pollution, seagoing ships were also recommended to equip storage on board and prepare a good garbage management plan (Olson, 1994;Ball, 1999;Polglaze, 2003). The concept of size of garbage reception facility presented by Ball (1999) was sharpened by Ulnikovic et al (2012). They explained how to provide the appropriate capacity of reception facility at port based on the marine traffic at port in the Republic of Serbia.…”