2022
DOI: 10.3390/nu14245349
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Slovenian Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women, Using Total, Free, and Bioavailable 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D)

Abstract: The objective of our study was to evaluate vitamin D status and its predictors in Slovenian premenopausal and postmenopausal women. A cross-sectional study was carried out between 1 March 2021 and 31 May 2021. A total of 319 healthy women from the Central Slovenian region aged between 44 and 65 were recruited; 176 were included in the final analysis. The vitamin D status was determined by measuring the total 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D) concentration, vitamin D binding protein (DBP), and albumin and cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower doses, or smaller duration of use, decrease the efficacy of these strategies, resulting in sufficiency rates < 50%, especially when small doses are used for short periods of time (e.g., use of mean daily doses ≤ 1200 IU for <12 months leads to sufficiency in 28.4% of our subjects). This is consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis, which highlighted that a longer duration of therapy or higher amounts of vitamin D supplements increase the likelihood of achieving vitamin D sufficiency in postmenopausal women [ 27 ]. The commonly used on/off strategies, where patients are placed on therapy for some months, only to resume therapy a few months or years later, appear completely ineffective in maintaining the vitamin D concentrations within the reference range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lower doses, or smaller duration of use, decrease the efficacy of these strategies, resulting in sufficiency rates < 50%, especially when small doses are used for short periods of time (e.g., use of mean daily doses ≤ 1200 IU for <12 months leads to sufficiency in 28.4% of our subjects). This is consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis, which highlighted that a longer duration of therapy or higher amounts of vitamin D supplements increase the likelihood of achieving vitamin D sufficiency in postmenopausal women [ 27 ]. The commonly used on/off strategies, where patients are placed on therapy for some months, only to resume therapy a few months or years later, appear completely ineffective in maintaining the vitamin D concentrations within the reference range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared with the results of Hribar et al (NUTRIHEALTH study, February-April 2019) ( 12 ), Vičič et al ( 11 ) found that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) in the adult population was much lower: 24.4% compared with 81.6%. Similarly, the prevalence of insufficient 25(OH)D levels (<75 nmol/L) was much lower: 67.6% compared with 98.0% This can be explained by supplement use, which was much higher than in the NUTRIHEALTH study (61.4% compared with 8.8%, respectively) ( 11 , 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In a study by Vičič et al ( 11 ) (March-May 2021), vitamin D status in Slovenian premenopausal and postmenopausal women was assessed. One of the main findings was that premenopausal women had 11.8% lower total 25(OH)D and 32.2% lower bioavailable 25(OH)D. Additionally, significant predictors of vitamin D status were identified, of which supplemental vitamin D intake was most important (r (175)=0.56, p<0.001), followed by time spent outside (r (175)=0.23, p [0.003]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, measuring bioavailable or free 25(OH)D might be more advantageous in certain populations. A study of vitamin D status among women was conducted in Slovenia ( 24 ) . The vitamin D status was determined by measuring the total 25(OH)D concentration, DBP and albumin and calculating the bioavailable 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D. For the calculation of bioavailable and free 25(OH)D, a new online calculator was developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%