Assessment of vulnerability to climate change using a multi-criteria outranking approach with application to heat stress in Sydney

Abstract

a b s t r a c tClimate change vulnerability assessment is a complex form of risk assessment which accounts for both geophysical and socio-economic components of risk. In indicator-based vulnerability assessment (IBVA), indicators are used to rank the vulnerabilities of socio-ecological systems (SESs). The predominant aggregation approach in the literature, sometimes based on multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT), typically builds a global-scale, utility function based on weighted summation, to generate rankings. However, the corresponding requirement for additive independence and complete knowledge of system interactions by analyst are rarely if ever satisfied in IBVA.We build an analogy between the structures of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and IBVA problems and show that a set of techniques called Outranking Methods, developed in MCDA to deal with criteria incommensurability, data uncertainty and preference imprecision, offer IBVA a sound alternative to additive or multiplicative aggregation. We reformulate IBVA problems within an outranking framework, define thresholds of difference and use an outranking method, ELECTRE III, to assess the relative vulnerability to heat stress of 15 local government areas in metropolitan Sydney. We find that the ranking outcomes are robust and argue that an outranking approach is better suited for assessments characterized by a mix of qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative indicators, threshold effects and uncertainties about the exact relationships between indicators and vulnerability.

Comparison of Flood Vulnerability Assessments to Climate Change by Construction Frameworks for a Composite Indicator

“…As in previous studies [28][29][30][31][32][33], this study has evaluated the influence of construction frameworks on the composite indicator outcomes and additionally proposed the proper scheme by comparison with a flood hazard map for the study site. However, this study has the following limitations.…”

Using multi‐criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems

“…quantitative versus qualitative) and their uncertainty (Antunes et al, ). It deals with criteria incommensurability, data uncertainty and preference imprecision (El‐Zein & Tonmoy, ). To avoid the issue of incommensurability, indicator values and weighting were normalized to bring the data into the same scale.…”

Dynamic Optimized Cleaner Production Strategies to Improve Water Environment and Economic Development in Leather Industrial Parks: A Case Study in Xinji, China

“…Currently, increasing studies have proposed mathematical methods to assess ecosystem dynamic evolution in industrial parks, such as system dynamics models, ecological cybernetics and sensitivity models, mathematical models, and multi-objective programming methods. In addition, the life cycle assessment [20], feasibility analysis [21], sustainable assessment [22], ecological vulnerability assessment [23][24][25], and other methods have also been used in numerous studies for industry sustainable development assessments.…”