2021
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1906897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of weld bead geometry in modified shortcircuiting gas metal arc welding process for low alloy steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of R-sq and R-sq(adj) are very close to each other, which indicates the less variability of the predicted responses with respect to the input parameters. The P values in the ANOVA table for linear, square, and interaction of input parameters are found to be less than 0.05 which indicates that the developed regression model is significant [ 31 ]. W 1 (µm) = −16422 + 28.75 P − 15.30 WS − 0.00807 P 2 + 0.01387 WS 2 − 0.00174 P·WS W 2 (µm) = −34885 + 54.1 P − 23.26 WS − 0.01718 P 2 + 0.00709 WS 2 + 0.00676 P·WS H 1 (µm) = 680 − 1.45 P + 2.55 WS + 0.000893 P 2 + 0.000805 WS 2 − 0.002470 P·WS H 2 (µm) = −506 − 1.54 P + 7.04 WS + 0.00162 P 2 + 0.00291 WS 2 − 0.006685 P·WS Y (MPa) = −2537 + 4.44 P − 1.864 WS − 0.001580 P 2 + 0.000715 WS 2 + 0.000951 P·WS …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of R-sq and R-sq(adj) are very close to each other, which indicates the less variability of the predicted responses with respect to the input parameters. The P values in the ANOVA table for linear, square, and interaction of input parameters are found to be less than 0.05 which indicates that the developed regression model is significant [ 31 ]. W 1 (µm) = −16422 + 28.75 P − 15.30 WS − 0.00807 P 2 + 0.01387 WS 2 − 0.00174 P·WS W 2 (µm) = −34885 + 54.1 P − 23.26 WS − 0.01718 P 2 + 0.00709 WS 2 + 0.00676 P·WS H 1 (µm) = 680 − 1.45 P + 2.55 WS + 0.000893 P 2 + 0.000805 WS 2 − 0.002470 P·WS H 2 (µm) = −506 − 1.54 P + 7.04 WS + 0.00162 P 2 + 0.00291 WS 2 − 0.006685 P·WS Y (MPa) = −2537 + 4.44 P − 1.864 WS − 0.001580 P 2 + 0.000715 WS 2 + 0.000951 P·WS …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, tacking was performed among both workpieces at a spacing of 03 mm ( Figure 3 b). These workpieces were then fastened for executing welding operation by means of the “Continuum 500” welding machine at obtained optimal settings [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The particulars of the welding settings are presented in Table 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, few scholars have optimized the welding operation prior to deploying it in practical uses, yet simply limited endeavors have been undertaken to utilize the RMD technique for low alloy steel. The scholars of this study [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] conducted a number of investigations with a viewpoint of determining the ideal welding conditions for low alloy steel concerning the bead geometry. Current (A) = 100 A, voltage (V) = 13 V, and gas flow rate (GFR) = 21 L/min were the optimal values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANFIS employs two techniques; gradient descend and least-squares method in updating parameters (hybrid learning method). In ne tuning the premise parameters, the gradient descend that de ne membership functions is employed, while the least -squares method is applied in identifying other parameters useful in de ning the coe cients of the output equations [32][33]. To begin the ANFIS modeling process, the data set (input-output data pairs) from the experimental study is dividing it into training and testing data sets.…”
Section: Development Of Anfis For the Weld Quality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%