2009
DOI: 10.2172/983699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of wind turbine seismic risk : existing literature and simple study of tower moment demand.

Abstract: Various sources of risk exist for all civil structures, one of which is seismic risk. As structures change in scale, the magnitude of seismic risk changes relative to risk from other sources. This paper presents an introduction to seismic hazard as applied to wind turbine structures. The existing design methods and research regarding seismic risk for wind turbines is then summarized. Finally a preliminary assessment is made based on current guidelines to understand how tower moment demand scales as rated power… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, comparative analyses in the time domain between the results obtained by fully-coupled simulation performed in GH BLADED [27] and those obtained by linear combination of separate wind and earthquake responses, the latter computed by adding different levels of aerodynamic damping, are carried out. The results show that errors in bending moment and shear forces are within engineering margins, which is encouraging for the use of the uncoupling approach, and confirm that a value of 4% for the aerodynamic damping, recommended by ASCE-AWEA RP2011 [17] and in previous studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], can reasonably also be used in time-domain uncoupled analyses.…”
Section: Structural Model Of the Tower And Aerodynamic Dampingsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, comparative analyses in the time domain between the results obtained by fully-coupled simulation performed in GH BLADED [27] and those obtained by linear combination of separate wind and earthquake responses, the latter computed by adding different levels of aerodynamic damping, are carried out. The results show that errors in bending moment and shear forces are within engineering margins, which is encouraging for the use of the uncoupling approach, and confirm that a value of 4% for the aerodynamic damping, recommended by ASCE-AWEA RP2011 [17] and in previous studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], can reasonably also be used in time-domain uncoupled analyses.…”
Section: Structural Model Of the Tower And Aerodynamic Dampingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, this is clearly a mere coincidence as, though similar in value, the two damping mechanisms are quite different. Subsequently, Prowell and Veers [7] performed a comprehensive study on the assessment of wind turbine seismic risk. Results showed that wind- In the past few years, researchers have tried to incorporate seismic loads into the structural assessment of wind turbines, and yet the work is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many attempts to study the seismic dynamic responses [6][7][8][9], structural safety [4,5,[10][11][12] and analytical methods [4,13] of wind turbines have been conducted. Most studies focused on onshore wind turbines, which are shorter in the cantilever length than their offshore counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the natural period T obtained should not be larger than 1.4 times the value of the natural period as calculated with the empirical formula. Prowell and Veers [23] collected wind turbine data. Assuming an exponential relationship between the turbine's natural period and its height, the result of fitting the data is Equation (9):…”
Section: Structural Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%