2020
DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.34.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment tools to evaluate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review

Abstract: Assessment tools for evaluating Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) are very important. These instruments are developed in especial context and especial community. Given the increase in the number of the ageing population, it is important to identify the barriers and performance problems of this community by these tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
81
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More points represent a more severe degree of decline in the ADL of the elderly. For the physical ADLS, selecting 1 to 2 activities as “entirely dependent” is defined as “mild disability,” selecting 3 to 4 as “entirely dependent” is defined as “moderate disability,” and selecting 5 to 6 as “entirely dependent” is defined as “severe disability.” The ADLS had acceptable construct validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α = .70–.98) in older adults (Pashmdarfard & Azad, 2020). The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale in this study was .891, supporting internal consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More points represent a more severe degree of decline in the ADL of the elderly. For the physical ADLS, selecting 1 to 2 activities as “entirely dependent” is defined as “mild disability,” selecting 3 to 4 as “entirely dependent” is defined as “moderate disability,” and selecting 5 to 6 as “entirely dependent” is defined as “severe disability.” The ADLS had acceptable construct validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α = .70–.98) in older adults (Pashmdarfard & Azad, 2020). The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale in this study was .891, supporting internal consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in CSF protein levels and GCS scores between the two groups at two and four weeks after treatment were compared and analyzed; Judgment of treatment effect: The recovery of the living ability of the two groups of patients after three months of treatment was observed. All patients were graded according to the neurological recovery score (ADL rating scale) after treatment 10 : Grade I: completely normal life, Grade II: able to basically take care of themselves in life, Grade III: living in need of help from others, Grade IV: conscious but unable to take care of themselves, Grade V: death. The overall good rate = Grade I + Grade II + Grade III.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire included basic personal information, information about social and support networks, social microenvironment, religious beliefs, family longevity, chronic disease, health self-assessment, eating habits, household drinking water, smoking status, alcohol/tea intake, physical exercise and daily and leisure activity. This was achieved using validated assessment tools, and where possible those designed specifically for use in elderly populations; Activities of Daily Living (ADL),8–10 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL),9 10 Clinical Frailty Scale,11 12 Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS),13 Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI),14 15 the short form of the multinutritional assessment (MNA-SF),16 17 mini mental-state exam (MMSE),18 19 the Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7)20 and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) 21. The questionnaire contents are detailed in table 1.…”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants’ daily living activity assessment used health self-assessment measures (body, emotion and feeling) together with the ADL (level of basic self-care) and IADL (ability to use basic appliances) scales 8–10. Based on previous research findings, we additionally used some simple, independently designed health self-evaluation questions covering the previous month of the participant’s life condition, including overall self-evaluation, limitations of the ability to undertake activity, the impact of health status on daily life, the impact of emotional status on daily life, pain status, self-assessed psychological state, the influence of health and mental state on daily social interaction and other issues.…”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation