The promotion of financial capability and asset building (FCAB) is an importantThe promotion of financial capability and asset building (FCAB) is an important and fitting professional activity for social work, which has long been concerned with the economic well-being of individuals and families. Because financial capability has been conceptualized as the result of the interaction of human agency (the ability to act) with social structures (institutions which create the opportunity to act), it is congruent with social work's emphasis on person-environment practice (Birkenmaier, Sherraden, & Curley, 2013;Johnson & Sherraden, 2007;Kemp, Whittaker, & Tracy, 1997).However, theoretical perspectives in the financial capability field and the asset building field have been conceptualized in relative isolation from one another. Financial capability has relied more heavily upon an individualistic view of economic actors, and focuses upon helping individuals to learn new skills, knowledge, and practices, often ignoring clients' social and economic contexts. Those working to help individuals gain financial knowledge have relied upon individually-focused interventions such as financial education (Collins & O'Rourke, 2009) and financial therapy (Archuleta & Grable, 2011). Conversely, the asset building field, which helps individuals and families to accumulate wealth through savings or investment (Sherraden, 1991), has focused more on structural theories, such as asset theory and behavioral economics, and has had relatively little to say about micro-level skills or theories (Despard & Chowa, 2010;Sherraden, Laux, & Kaufman, 2007 Scanlon & Sanders/FINANCIAL CAPABILITY 544 led to a lack of role clarity on the part of agency level staff tasked with the delivery of these programs.It is important for social work to incorporate both structural and individual factors in our understanding of financial capability. Failing to incorporate a structural view of FCAB can lead to a sort of victim-blaming in which individuals are assigned responsibility for their financial circumstances without acknowledgement of the social, political, and economic systems that shape financial life chances (Olen, 2012). At the same time, while structural theories are appropriate frameworks for constructing social policy and programs, they are less useful as a guide for direct practitioners who contend with the complicated dynamics of human behavior and interpersonal interaction. While the specific structural changes needed for a fully inclusive and just financial system are beyond the scope of this paper, working directly with clients to promote financial capability requires an understanding of the political and economic environments in which clients live, and it requires an understanding of relevant psychological and behavioral characteristics that impact outcomes.In this article, we present a theoretically-driven, person-environment framework for FCAB practice. We suggest a model for use by social workers practicing in settings that focus on promo...