2024
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12566-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assigning multiple labels of sustainable development goals to open educational resources for sustainability education

Rui Yao,
Meilin Tian,
Chi-Un Lei
et al.

Abstract: Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 4.7 aims to ensure learners acquire the knowledge and skills for promoting sustainable development by 2030. Yet, Open Educational Resources (OERs) that connect the public with SDGs are currently limitedly assigned and insufficient to promote SDG and sustainability education to support the achievement of SDG 4.7 and other SDGs by 2030, indicating a need for automatic classification of SDG-related OERs. However, most existing labeling systems can not support multiple labeling,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of indicators not only aligns with the overall objectives of the SDGs but also resonates with the characteristics of the southern hilly regions in China while also being inspired by the existing literature [25][26][27]. During the selection process, we focused on various aspects such as economic conditions [28], food security [29], medical resources [30], educational resources [31], water resource management [32], clean energy usage, economic growth, industrial innovation, urban sustainable development, climate action, and ecosystem health [28,32,33]. Through these processes, we have constructed a representative and locally distinctive SDG evaluation index system.…”
Section: Construction Of Sdg Assessment Indicator Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of indicators not only aligns with the overall objectives of the SDGs but also resonates with the characteristics of the southern hilly regions in China while also being inspired by the existing literature [25][26][27]. During the selection process, we focused on various aspects such as economic conditions [28], food security [29], medical resources [30], educational resources [31], water resource management [32], clean energy usage, economic growth, industrial innovation, urban sustainable development, climate action, and ecosystem health [28,32,33]. Through these processes, we have constructed a representative and locally distinctive SDG evaluation index system.…”
Section: Construction Of Sdg Assessment Indicator Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%