2015
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-14-00126.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilating Surface Mesonet Observations with the EnKF to Improve Ensemble Forecasts of Convection Initiation on 29 May 2012

Abstract: Surface data assimilation (DA) has the potential to improve forecasts of convection initiation (CI) and short-term forecasts of convective evolution. Since the processes driving CI occur on scales inadequately observed by conventional observation networks, mesoscale surface networks could be especially beneficial given their higher temporal and spatial resolution. This work aims to assess the impact of high-frequency assimilation of mesonet surface DA on ensemble forecasts of CI initialized with ensemble Kalma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This blind region to the radar largely lies in the planetary boundary layer (PBL), in which PBL processes such as horizontal convective rolls, drylines, and cold-pools can trigger convection under a favorable large-scale environment (Sobash and Stensrud, 2015). In particular, surface-based cold pools produced by the evaporation of precipitation can influence the initiation, development and propagation of convective systems (e.g., Tompkins, 2001;Lima and Wilson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This blind region to the radar largely lies in the planetary boundary layer (PBL), in which PBL processes such as horizontal convective rolls, drylines, and cold-pools can trigger convection under a favorable large-scale environment (Sobash and Stensrud, 2015). In particular, surface-based cold pools produced by the evaporation of precipitation can influence the initiation, development and propagation of convective systems (e.g., Tompkins, 2001;Lima and Wilson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitchcock et al (2016) also show midlevel moisture improvements, but from assimilating special rawinsonde observations collected during a field campaign. Similarly, Sobash and Stensrud (2015) demonstrate improved diurnal CI forecasts through the assimilation of surface mesonet observations that increase the moisture within the boundary layer. Until recently, previous studies that evaluate the impact of assimilating AERI profiles have only assimilated simulated observations (Hartung et al 2011;Otkin et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some of these sources have great potential to be used in meteorology and NWP models. Useful observations may come from nonconventional sensors such as vehicles (Anderson et al ., 2012), personal weather stations (Madaus and Hakim, 2014; Sobash and Stensrud, 2015; Clark et al ., 2018; Gasperoni et al ., 2019; Nipen et al ., 2020) and smartphones (Madaus and Mass, 2017; McNicholas and Mass, 2018b; Hintz et al ., 2019b). Alternatively, “social sensing” derives weather observations from social media content.…”
Section: How Might Crowd‐sourced Observations Be Useful For Numerical Weather Prediction?mentioning
confidence: 99%