Seeds: Biology, Development and Ecology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Seeds, Brisbane, Australia, May 20 2007
DOI: 10.1079/9781845931971.0374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted natural recovery using a forest soil propagule bank in the athabasca oil sands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest floor material (including the litter, fermenting litter and humus layers) and surface mineral horizons) houses a rich bud and seed bank, which serves as the main source of native species propagules for vegetation re-establishment following many natural and human-caused disturbances (Greene et al 1999;Paré et al 1993;Schimmel and Granstrom 1996). The potential of this material for use in reclamation was recognized in Australia as early as the 1970's (Grant and Koch 2007) and this approach has gained recent interest in North America (e.g., Mackenzie and Naeth 2007;Cohen-Fernandez and Naeth 2013;Skousen et al 2011;Macdonald et al 2015).…”
Section: Natural Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest floor material (including the litter, fermenting litter and humus layers) and surface mineral horizons) houses a rich bud and seed bank, which serves as the main source of native species propagules for vegetation re-establishment following many natural and human-caused disturbances (Greene et al 1999;Paré et al 1993;Schimmel and Granstrom 1996). The potential of this material for use in reclamation was recognized in Australia as early as the 1970's (Grant and Koch 2007) and this approach has gained recent interest in North America (e.g., Mackenzie and Naeth 2007;Cohen-Fernandez and Naeth 2013;Skousen et al 2011;Macdonald et al 2015).…”
Section: Natural Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive use of peat has been motivated by its abundance in the premining landscape, while forest floor salvaged from upland areas has been shown to be an excellent source of seeds and propagules for native forest communities (Mackenzie and Naeth 2006;Naeth et al 2013). In addition, FFM may promote soil microbial activity (Béasse et al 2015), and the development of microbial communities more similar to those found on natural forest soils, although this may be due more to differences in the plant communities growing on the two types of reconstructed soils than to initial differences in the composition of PM and FFM (Hahn and Quideau 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Site 1, records from 1999 indicated plant cover to be higher for FFM than PM (Mapfumo 2003), although at the time plant cover was low (1-2 %), and much lower than what we measured during our study (10-30 %). Further, on Site 3, an assessment completed in 2004 reported that plots reclaimed with FFM had significantly higher plant richness, diversity and total density than plots reclaimed with PM (Mackenzie and Naeth 2006). Total microbial biomass on all reclaimed sites increased approximately 480 % throughout our sevenyear monitoring period (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Currently two sources of amendments are used in the region: peat, which is salvaged from the abundant lowland pre-mining areas, and forest floor, which is obtained from upland boreal forest stands similar to the reclamation target ecosystems. The application of forest floor materials to reclaimed areas has been shown to provide a source of propagules, and results in a greater native revegetation response compared to sites reclaimed with peat (Mackenzie and Naeth 2006). However, whether the greater presence of native plants promotes soil microbial communities more similar to those on natural forest sites is yet unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%