The story of this cluster has a personal beginning: I was in need of more conversations with scholars conducting empirical work on the social studies of assisted reproduction (AR) in Latin America. What better way to start this conversation than with a cluster! This personal need shaped the cluster's main objective: to offer a space to initiate conversations that are plural in their perspectives, critical in their methods, reflexive in their analysis, and interested in exploring the field of AR studies in its temporal and geographical complexity. Throughout 7 papers, written by 10 authors, the cluster offers a look at specific moments and interactions in the practice of AR in five countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Spain. The stories and reflections presented here highlight some of the intersections of this global, expanding, multidisciplinary, life-creating industry. Overall, the cluster addresses questions regarding the different ways in which attention to infertility, through the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), is practiced in different countries, cities, and cultures within Latin America. The works collected in this cluster offer examples that support the claim that the way reproduction, with everything it implies, is understood, addressed, and practiced is anything but universal. 1 Reproduction is an individual and collective experience that is culturally, geographically bounded, and temporally situated. However, local reproductive practices are also (and growingly so) entangled with other local reproductive practices, making this a global phenomenon. These papers also show that AR is a field larger than its technologies and that it has changed over time. Thus, we should be cautious not to fall prey to what Florencia Luna and Allison Wolf (2014) call an anachronistic "historical photography" of AR. We should not assume that AR is what it once was, that it remains as it was conceived and practiced in Europe in the seventies. This anachronistic image does not represent what happens today, what happens in other geographies, nor what will happen tomorrow. In the early days, AR was a way to medically help couples have biologically related children, now it is used for other purposes and it produces more than babies: it produces and reproduces values, norms, rules and regulations, identities, institutions, industries, tools and procedures, expectations, families, societies, relationships, and more. After 40 years since the first attempts at in vitro fertilization