2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisting problem gamblers in the gaming venue: An assessment of practices and procedures followed by frontline hospitality staff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fear of a potential bad reaction from the client was pointed out as the main reason for not taking action, largely exceeding other relevant reasons, such as uncertainty about their observations and about how to approach PGs, time constraints and the business interest of the establishment. Taken together, these first findings are globally in line with those of Hing and Nuske (Hing and Nuske 2011;Hing et al 2013), who reported that gambling venue staff were confident about their ability to recognize problem gambling behaviors in clients, very rarely solicited by PGs seeking help and reluctant to intervene, and that they attributed such reluctance to the fear of potential negative reactions of the client. We therefore extend this evidence to VLT operators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fear of a potential bad reaction from the client was pointed out as the main reason for not taking action, largely exceeding other relevant reasons, such as uncertainty about their observations and about how to approach PGs, time constraints and the business interest of the establishment. Taken together, these first findings are globally in line with those of Hing and Nuske (Hing and Nuske 2011;Hing et al 2013), who reported that gambling venue staff were confident about their ability to recognize problem gambling behaviors in clients, very rarely solicited by PGs seeking help and reluctant to intervene, and that they attributed such reluctance to the fear of potential negative reactions of the client. We therefore extend this evidence to VLT operators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An exploratory qualitative study based on staff interviews reported high confidence in their abilities to recognize problem gambling behaviors. Nevertheless, it was also reported that venue frontline staff are rarely approached by clients seeking assistance, that frontline staff are reluctant to intervene, and that one major barrier to intervention is the fear of potential negative reactions of the clients (Hing and Nuske 2011). These findings contribute greatly to the understanding of venue staff practices in the presence of problem gambling behaviors by suggesting that, despite the training of frontline staff and their crucial role in the venue during gambling activities, the efficiency of the responsible gambling assistance plan remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study involving 177 VLT operators examined owners' and staff members' reluctance to intervene with clients who were showing signs of problem gambling (Tomei & Zumwald, 2016). In-keeping with the reports of a previous Australian inquiry (Hing & Nuske, 2011), the study showed that these frontline VLT operators are confident in their ability to identify the signs of problem gambling. They are, however, reticent to intervene, mainly due to fear of potential negative reactions from the gambler.…”
Section: Data From Lottery: Examining Problem Gambling Detection and mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Giroux et al (2008) argued that if employee training is to be an effective responsible gambling feature, it is important for training to be an ongoing process, extending and reinforcing initial training, and thus demonstrating the importance of the responsible gambling role for employees. This is prudent given that often employees retain hesitation about the responsible gambling role, when to many, superficially at least, the reduction of excessive gambling is incongruent to the commercial interests of the gambling venue (Hing, 2007;Hing & Nuske, 2011).…”
Section: Employee Responsible Gambling Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%