2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2011.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisting the diagnosis of overt hypothyroidism with pattern recognition methods, making use of a set of routine tests, and their multiple correlation with total T4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the present study, Aoki's et al 17 study used pattern recognition methods such as neural networks to predict the likelihood of thyroid dysfunction from a set of routine test parameters such as ALP, S-Cr, and TC. Their results suggested that most patients with overt thyroid dysfunction could be screened by using a set of routine clinical data without measuring thyroid hormone levels.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the present study, Aoki's et al 17 study used pattern recognition methods such as neural networks to predict the likelihood of thyroid dysfunction from a set of routine test parameters such as ALP, S-Cr, and TC. Their results suggested that most patients with overt thyroid dysfunction could be screened by using a set of routine clinical data without measuring thyroid hormone levels.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For the hypothyroidism classification in this study, the hypothyroidism group was used as a positive label, whereas both the control and hyperthyroidism groups were negatively labeled (referred to as "crosstalk on"). On the other hand, related studies 16,17 performed classification by setting thyroid dysfunction patients (with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism) as a positive label and only the control group as a negative label (referred to as "crosstalk off"). Therefore, we evaluated the performance of the models with similar settings as these studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations