2006
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.54.1162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisting the Diagnosis of Thyroid Diseases with Bayesian-Type and SOM-Type Neural Networks Making Use of Routine Test Data

Abstract: Both classification problems and QSAR analyses of drugs have been better studied by the multi-layer feedforward neural networks with back-propagation learning than the classical methods in pattern recognition such as linear multiple regression or adaptive least square method, since those problems often involve nonlinear relationships between descriptors and the class (/activity). [1][2][3] Recently Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN), [4][5][6][7] which extends back-propagation learning algorithm in or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only found 8 studies in this field, most of them using information from imaging tests or pathology reports. We considered laboratory information as a secondary step that should be applied after defining the risk of malignancy of the nodule (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) If we consider individual variables, as shown in table 3, lower risk factors, as may be seen in middle-aged female patients, are assigned a malignancy probability of 19%, a patient without risk factors, such as radiotherapy or family history, is assigned a probability of 25% or a patient with multiple nodules that are smaller than 1 cm and have a soft consistency is assigned a probability of 20%, which are clearly higher than those reported in the literature, of finding carcinoma in an index nodule, which is approximately 5 to 15%. This was corroborated by the clinical cases, in which a patient without any risk factors is assigned a probability of malignancy of 19%, and in the final results that were obtained by the network, where a patient without risk factors has a basal probability of malignancy of 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only found 8 studies in this field, most of them using information from imaging tests or pathology reports. We considered laboratory information as a secondary step that should be applied after defining the risk of malignancy of the nodule (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) If we consider individual variables, as shown in table 3, lower risk factors, as may be seen in middle-aged female patients, are assigned a malignancy probability of 19%, a patient without risk factors, such as radiotherapy or family history, is assigned a probability of 25% or a patient with multiple nodules that are smaller than 1 cm and have a soft consistency is assigned a probability of 20%, which are clearly higher than those reported in the literature, of finding carcinoma in an index nodule, which is approximately 5 to 15%. This was corroborated by the clinical cases, in which a patient without any risk factors is assigned a probability of malignancy of 19%, and in the final results that were obtained by the network, where a patient without risk factors has a basal probability of malignancy of 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 5 explanatory variables as the baseline set of features (referred to as Feature set 2): sex, AST, ALT, γ-GTP, and total cholesterol, of which four features were the required laboratory tests conducted in the Japanese national health screening program called Specific Health Checkups. In addition, hemoglobin (Hb), RBC, creatinine (S-Cr), ALP, and UA, which are the tests measured only at the doctor's discretion, are reported to be highly relevant to thyroid dysfunction 14,15 , these were added to the above items. We also included the UA/S-Cr ratio in this study considering that a reduction in S-Cr has been reported in hyperthyroidism, while UA has not been confirmed to fluctuate with thyroid dysfunction.…”
Section: Explanatory Features (Variables) For Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 11 variables as explanatory variables in this study as the first experimented set of features (referred to as Feature set 1) in this study, of which eight tests are tests measured in routine health checkup: sex, AST, ALT, γ-GTP, total cholesterol, Hemoglobin (Hb), RBC, and creatinine (S-Cr). In addition, since ALP, UA, and S-Cr ratio are reported to be highly relevant to thyroid dysfunction (24,25), these were added to the above items. We also included UA/S-Cr ratio in this study considering that the reduction of S-Cr has been reported in hyperthyroidism, while UA has not been confirmed to fluctuate with thyroid dysfunction.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self Organizing Map (also known as Kohonen Map) is a unsupervised learning algorithm (Kohonen, 2001) used for clustering and reducing dimensions of complex data with-J Proteomics Bioinform Volume 2(2) : 097-107 (2009) -098 ISSN:0974-276X JPB, an open access journal out loosing 'essence' of the data and is capable of organizing data based on the similarity by putting entities geometrically close to each other. SOMs have been applied in diverse fields like assessment of water quality (Walley et al, 2000), classification of communities (Chon et al, 1996;Arab et al, 2004;Tison et al, 2005), gene expression studies (Tamayo et al, 1999), disease diagnosis (Chen et al, 2000;Hoshi et al, 2006), medical imaging (Chuang et al, 2007), biochemical profiling (Kaartinen et al, 1998) and epidemiology (Murty and Arora, 2007). Self organizing maps have been earlier used in classification of families (Andrade et al, 1997), secondary structure determination(Unneberg et al, 2001) and pattern recognition in proteins (Hanke et al 1996).Owing to its use for multidimensional data visualization, SOM has aptly become the method of choice in bioinformatics studies (Hsu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%