2020
DOI: 10.1891/jarc-d-19-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African Americans With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature and Policy

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available peer-reviewed and gray literature on assistive technology (AT) access and usage barriers among African Americans with disabilities. Authors completed a historical review (Onwuegbuzie & Frels, 2016) of the extant literature on AT and disability public policy mandates by framing the context on AT access and usage disparities among African Americans with disabilities and discussing AT impacts on employment for African America… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the U.S. and Canada, a lack of federal legislation specific to AT has led to inconsistencies in obtaining much-needed AT for many adults with ID (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine, 2017; Schreiber et al, 2017). In particular, adults with ID with limited financial resources and Black adults with disabilities experience challenges in procuring AT (Friedman & Rizzolo, 2017; Ward-Sutton et al, 2020). AT funding is also likely to exclude mainstream technologies, which means that only those adults with ID who can pay for these technologies out of pocket can access them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S. and Canada, a lack of federal legislation specific to AT has led to inconsistencies in obtaining much-needed AT for many adults with ID (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine, 2017; Schreiber et al, 2017). In particular, adults with ID with limited financial resources and Black adults with disabilities experience challenges in procuring AT (Friedman & Rizzolo, 2017; Ward-Sutton et al, 2020). AT funding is also likely to exclude mainstream technologies, which means that only those adults with ID who can pay for these technologies out of pocket can access them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, members with other intersecting identities within Black and disabled communities (e.g. members with sensory disabilities, members with less education irrespective of disability type, non-English speakers, older adults) have additional barriers, including lower levels of digital adoption and higher risk of having an inaccessible digital experience (Friedman & VanPuymbrouck, 2021; Ward-Sutton et al, 2020). For instance, consider a Spanish-speaking Afro-Latinx male with a history of a brain injury who is discharged from acute inpatient rehabilitation after contracting COVID-19.…”
Section: Intersectional Ecological Model: Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted how AT can be a cultural mismatch for many Asian Americans and Native Americans, who do not necessarily view disability as having medical or social causes, or for Mexican American families, who report linguistic barriers to accessing AAC training and support. AT access and usage barriers also are created by schools being underresourced and the underrepresentation of Black and other diverse voices in policymaking organizations (Ward-Sutton et al, 2020).…”
Section: Social Justice Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%