Assistive technology for independent living with dementia: Stylized facts and research gaps

Abstract

Background: Recent advancement in assistive technologies (AT) have fueled the debate on new, IT-reliant ways of providing cure and care of dementia. Still the impact on practice has been little. With this paper, we want to find out to which extent current studies have discussed the impacts of AT for dementia. Methods: We conduct a scoping review of the literature on impacts of AT usage in the context of dementia. We search disciplinary (ACM, EMBASE, PsycInfo) as well as cross-disciplinary databases (EBSCO, Web of Science). Based on the identified relevant papers, we extract a list of original statements, which we aggregate to stylized facts. The method of stylized facts is a common research method to derive knowledge in the form of generalized and simplified statements describing interesting characteristics and relationships concerning empirically observable phenomena. Results: We identify n=539 unique articles, out of which n=36 report impacts of AT usage in the context of dementia. We aggregate 6 stylized facts that describe common findings. Furthermore, we identify research gaps in this domain. There is little known about the suitable design of social systems around assistive technologies. Conclusions: While the identified stylized facts indicate how much evidence there is behind certain common statements in the reviewed literature, we additionally find that studies in the area of AT for dementia often neglect the socioeconomic and ethical dimension. These are important research gaps for future work.

Perceived Need and Acceptability of an App to Support Activities of Daily Living in People With Cognitive Impairment and Their Carers: Pilot Survey Study

“…However, technologies for people with cognitive impairment have seen a slow rate of uptake, which could be partly attributed to a lack of user-centered design and validation [ 6 , 7 ]. Studies have tended to focus on technological possibilities and design rather than the usability and acceptability of these technologies for older people [ 8 ], which are particularly important to evaluate for this population that is often reluctant to adopt new technologies [ 9 ]. Even in studies that have evaluated technology usability among people with cognitive impairment, carers have often been the participants [ 10 ]—few have evaluated usability or acceptability for people with memory problems [ 9 , 11 , 12 ].…”

<p>A Comprehensive Scoping Review Protocol of Using Living Labs to Explore Needs and Solutions for Older Adults with Dementia</p>

“…With these ends in mind, we will explore open innovation in the health arena, suggesting that it has become a significant sector in pushing the limits of open methods and that this is challenging mainstream conceptions of the targets of health innovation. 9 This context points to the utility to design methods oriented towards increasing the participation of users and stakeholders, whether non-specialists or professionals. 10,11 The European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) is an active promotor of the approach.…”

Citizen Participation in Smart Government: A Conceptual Model and Two IoT Case Studies

“…For many years, local governments and the EC invested considerable financial resources into the development of assistive technologies for elderly people and others in need of increased care (Bächle et al 2018), to improve their autonomy and wellbeing (Kubitschke et al 2010). This is motivated by the fact that senior citizens living in homecare settings are much more independent and active (Sun et al 2009;Mageroski et al 2016) and generate a fraction of the costs of older people in longterm care facilities (Wimo et al 2010).…”