2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0280-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associated liver and multivisceral resections: should we extend the frontiers of resectability?

Abstract: Combined liver and multivisceral resections (CLMVRs) are rare procedures that demand extensive surgical skills. Few reports have discussed the benefit of these complex procedures and their indications are poorly defined. The aim of the present study is to present short- and long-term results of CLMVRs in primary and metastatic malignancies, including a risk analysis for perioperative morbidity and mortality. A review of our prospective surgical database between November 2007 and August 2013 identified 21 patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Risk factors related to perioperative mortality and morbidity are patient's clinical performance, preoperative liver function, extension of liver resection, as well as the simultaneous resection of other abdominal organs. 4,5 The largest experience with liver resection associated with other gastrointestinal organs comes from colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. 6 Few studies have evaluated the results of hepatectomies associated with resection of adjacent organs (multivisceral liver resections [MLRs]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2,3 Risk factors related to perioperative mortality and morbidity are patient's clinical performance, preoperative liver function, extension of liver resection, as well as the simultaneous resection of other abdominal organs. 4,5 The largest experience with liver resection associated with other gastrointestinal organs comes from colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. 6 Few studies have evaluated the results of hepatectomies associated with resection of adjacent organs (multivisceral liver resections [MLRs]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Few studies have evaluated the results of hepatectomies associated with resection of adjacent organs (multivisceral liver resections [MLRs]). 5,7 The rationale of this procedure is that potentially curative treatment of primary liver neoplasms and certain liver metastases is possible when free surgical margins are obtained (R0 resection). 7,8 MLRs have been performed in centers of excellence in hepatobiliary surgery due to technical advances in liver surgery, better knowledge of liver and vascular anatomy, and improvements in perioperative care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the beginning of the introduction of LLR, one of the more frequent criticisms was that, because of a more challenging approach for anatomical segmentectomies, in most cases a non-anatomical resection is performed with thinner resection margins compared with open surgery [6]. However, even in the presence of reduced surgical margins, oncological results in the short- and long-term follow-ups are the same such as open surgery especially for colorectal liver metastasis [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 In a hand of skillful and experienced robotic team, robotic multivisceral resection for PNET is feasible with optimal outcomes in well selected patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%