2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-008-2902-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associated primes for cohomology modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalence of (1), (2) and (3) was noted in [10], and the fact that (4) implies any of these is shown using only the results of [10]. The implication (3) ⇒ (4) is new, and requires the following explicit description of the associated primes of H m (G, R) found in [6]: …”
Section: Proposition 23 Let G Be a Finite Group Acting Linearly On mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The equivalence of (1), (2) and (3) was noted in [10], and the fact that (4) implies any of these is shown using only the results of [10]. The implication (3) ⇒ (4) is new, and requires the following explicit description of the associated primes of H m (G, R) found in [6]: …”
Section: Proposition 23 Let G Be a Finite Group Acting Linearly On mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the modular case, on the other hand, K[V ] G almost always fails to be Cohen-Macaulay, see [12]. The depth of K[V ] G has attracted much attention and has been determined for various families of representations, see for example [3,8,10,13,17]. In this paper we consider ideals of K[V ] G as modules over K[V ] G .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16, Lemma 2.4, Proposition 2.5], Ann k[V ] G (g) = I(V G ) ∩ k[V ] G , where I(V G ) denotes the ideal of polynomials f ∈ k[V ] vanishing on V G . Thus, the height of Ann k[V ] G (g) is codim(V G ) = 3 while, by[22, Corollary 1.6], its depth is only two.Using MAGMA[4] and the methods of[24, Section 2], one can verify that {a 1 := x 3 , a 2 := x 4 , a 3 := x 5 , a }…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%