2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associated risk factors with quantitative erosive tooth wear progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraoral scanners (IOSs) in particular provide new perspectives, as these devices can be used to create digital models very quickly and without the need for conventional impression taking and cast fabrication. A recent study [15] used this method and showed that a group of 11-18-year-old adolescents lost an average of 0.013 ± 0.009 mm 3 of dental hard tissue per square millimeter of tooth surface at the incisal edges of the upper anterior teeth and the occlusal surfaces of the mandibular first molars within 1 year. Latter are the most common teeth to exhibit these lesions and show the most pronounced progression rates [9,10,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoral scanners (IOSs) in particular provide new perspectives, as these devices can be used to create digital models very quickly and without the need for conventional impression taking and cast fabrication. A recent study [15] used this method and showed that a group of 11-18-year-old adolescents lost an average of 0.013 ± 0.009 mm 3 of dental hard tissue per square millimeter of tooth surface at the incisal edges of the upper anterior teeth and the occlusal surfaces of the mandibular first molars within 1 year. Latter are the most common teeth to exhibit these lesions and show the most pronounced progression rates [9,10,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all factors associated with TW, the sociodemographic factors were the most frequently studied in this scoping review (68.9% of included studies, n = 188) 2–5,20–197 . Sex and age represented 58.6% and 46.9% of studies in this category (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Medical history was the second most frequently studied factor (67% of included studies; n = 183), 2,3,5,22–24,26–35,38,40,42–44,47,49–51,53,56–58,60–64,68–70,74,75,77,78,80,81,83,85,87,90–92,94–96,98,101,102,104–108,110,111,113,114,119–130,132,136–138,140–144,147,148,151,153–157,159,161,162,166,167,169,172,173,176–178, 180,181,185,188–190,194,196,197,199–256 and 27 studies were exclusively dedicated to this topic. The influence of the presence of GORD, stomach upset or heartburn was the most studied factor from this category, with 35.2% of studies included in this scoping review (96 out of 273).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, any resulting differences are expected to be minimal, given the demonstrated high accuracy of intraoral scanners in assessing tissue loss, assessed in relation to Micro- CT scanning (Mitrirattanakul et al, 2023). Furthermore, intraoral scanners have proven highly reliable in detecting small amounts of dental tissue loss in a clinical setting (e.g., García et al, 2022; Marro et al, 2022; Schlenz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their potential has also been demonstrated to accurately measure dental tissue loss, which holds great utility in a clinical setting. This is particularly beneficial for tracking pathology and wear progression through time (e.g., O’Toole et al, 2019a; García et al, 2022; Marro et al, 2022; Schlenz et al, 2022; Mitrirattanakul et al, 2023). Specific software designed to measure dental tissue loss using intraoral scanner 3D models has been developed (e.g., WearCompare ; O’Toole et al, 2019) and has demonstrated reliability even over short time intervals (O’Toole et al, 2019a; O’Toole et al, 2020; O’Toole et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%