Association and Multivariate Analysis of Yield and Yield Component Traits in Mungbean [<i>Vigna radiata</i>(L.) Wilczek]

Pathak, Nidhi; Mishra, MK; Singh, M.

doi:10.5958/0976-1926.2014.00008.4

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The trait primary branches per plant were positively and significantly associated with clusters per pod (1.00), pods per plant (0.96) and seed yield per plant (0.41). Similar results were obtained by Biradar et al, (2007), Singh et al, (2009 b ), Kumar et al, (2010b), Khajudparn andTantasawat (2011), Narasimhulu et al, (2013), Kumar et al, (2013), Prasanna et al, (2013), Titumeer et al, (2014), Pathak et al, (2014), Javed et al, (2014) and Patel et al, (2014).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 79%

“…The genotypic correlation of seeds per pod with 100 seed weight (1.00), seed yield per plant (0.78) and harvest index (0.34) was positive and significant. The similar results were also observed by Biradar et al, (2007), Kumar et al, (2010a), Rahim et al,(2010), Kumar et al, (2010b), Khajudparn and Tantasawat (2011), Reddy et al, (2011), Gadakh et al, (2013, Narasimhulu et al, (2013), Kumar et al, (2013), Patel et al, (2014), Pathak et al, (2014), Titumeer et al, (2014), Rathor et al, (2015), Hemavathy et al, (2015) and Das and Barua (2015). Hundred seed weight showed positive and significant association with harvest index (1.00) and seed yield per plant (0.98).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 77%

“…Clusters per plant were positively and significantly associated with pods per plant (0.89) and seed yield per plant (0.69). The similar results were also observed by Sadiq et al, (2005), Biradar et al, (2007), Srivastava et al, (2008), Singh et al,(2009 b ), Tabasum et al, (2010), Khajudparn and Tantasawat (2011), Gadakh et al, (2013), Narasimhulu et al, (2013), Prasanna et al, (2013), Patel et al, (2014), Ahmad et al,(2014), Pathak et al,(2014), Singh and Kumar (2014), Rathor et al, (2015), Hemavathy et al, (2015) and Keerthinandan et al, (2016). Positive and significant correlation of pods per plant was observed with seed yield per plant (0.92), 100 seed weight (0.48) and seeds per pod (0.41).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 77%

“…An observation of the data of cross Meha x GJM-1006 revealed that days to 50% flowering showed positive and significant correlation with plant height (0.52), primary branches (0.76), clusters per plant (0.44) and days to maturity (1.00). This finding is in accordance with Kumar et al, (2005), Biradar et al, (2007), Makeen et al, (2007), a ), Rahim et al, (2010), Khajudparn and Tantasawat (2011), Reddy et al, (2011), Srivastava and Singh (2012), Gadakh et al, (2013), Prasanna et al, (2013), Titumeer et al, (2014), Khaimichho et al, (2014), Patel et al, (2014), Singh and Kumar (2014), Pathak et al, (2014), Rathor et al, (2015), Hemavathy et al, (2015). Plant height was positively and significantly associated with primary branches per plant (0.33), days to maturity (0.62), clusters per plant (0.69), pods per plant (0.76), seeds per pod (0.38), 100 seed weight (0.40) and seed yield per plant (0.77).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The association of plant height was positive and significant with primary branches per plant (0.86), days to maturity (0.91), clusters per plant (0.86), pods per plant (0.87), seeds per pod (0.69), 100 seed weight (0.53) and seed yield per plant (0.85). These results are also in agreement with the findings of Parameswarappa (2005), Biradar et al, (2007), Makeen et al, (2007), Srivastava et al, (2008), Kumar et al, (2010a), Reddy et al, (2011), Khajudparn andTantasawat (2011), Prasanna et al, (2013), Gadakh et al, (2013), Kumar et al, (2013), Alom et al, (2011), Titumeer et al, (2014, Ahmad et al, (2014), Singh and Kumar (2014), Pathak et al, (2014), Rathor et al, (2015), Hemavathy et al, (2015) and Keerthinandan et al, (2016). Primary branches per plant were positively and significantly associated with days to maturity (0.63), pods per plant (0.61), clusters per plant (1.00), 100 seed weight (0.75) and seed yield per plant (0.70).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Correlation and Path Analysis in F4 Progenies of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] for Seed Yield and its Attributes

Keerthiga¹,

Sen²,

Pandya³

et al. 2018

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Correlation and Path Analysis in F4 Progenies of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] for Seed Yield and its Attributes

Keerthiga¹,

Sen²,

Pandya³

et al. 2018

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring intra-allelic and inter-allelic gene interactions influencing seed yield and its components in inter-varietal crosses of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

Nivethitha,

Babu,

Jayamani

2024

J Exp Bio & Ag Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) is a versatile legume widely cultivated for its nutritional value and adaptability. Meeting the increasing global demand for nutritious food requires the development of high-yielding varieties. Therefore, understanding the inheritance of yield and component traits is crucial for defining effective breeding strategies. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the genetic effects and interactions governing inheritance through generation mean analysis. The four crosses viz., IPM409-4×VGG18-002, IPM409-4×WGG42, COGG13-39×VGG16-058 and COGG13-39×VGG18-002 and their five generations (P1, P2, F1, F2, and F3) were evaluated for nine yield and yield component traits during 2023 summer season. The significance of additive, dominance, and epistatic components viz.,additive×additive [i] and dominance×dominance [l] of each trait was found to be different among all the crosses. Mungbean is a self-pollinated crop, so only fixable gene effects can be exploited for trait improvement. In the IPM409-4×VGG18-002 cross, all the traits exhibited additive or additive × additive gene action except for plant height and seed yield per plant (dominance). The scaling test was significant in IPM409-4×WGG42 cross for all the traits, except for the number of pods per cluster. Except for the number of branches per plant in which the dominance effect was evident, additive or additive×additive gene effects were observed for the other traits. In COGG13-39×VGG16-058 and COGG13-39×VGG18-002 crosses, all the yield traits recorded fixable (additive and additive×additive) gene effects except for number of pods per plant in COGG13-39×VGG18-002. Considering the results of all four crosses, gene actions that exhibit consistency across crosses revealed that epistatic interaction (additive×additive) significantly influenced the expression of various mung bean traits. Therefore, the later generation selection of short-duration segregants with high yield, bold seeds, and resistance to yellow mosaic disease from the above populations can be carried out to develop commercially valuable mung bean varieties.

show abstract

Genetic evaluation of yield and its component traits by using generation mean analysis in inter-varietal crosses of urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]

SOHARU¹,

Sood²,

Mittal³

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Urdbean is a prominent legume crop with excellent nutritive value that is utilized in many ways throughout India. To fulfill the increasing demand, production must be enhanced through the use of breeding procedures which leads to production of high yielding cultivars. This necessitates a thorough examination of the gene action involved in the regulation of yield and its attributing traits, which can be accomplished by generation mean analysis. Methods: In present investigation, generation mean analysis was employed for 11 characters by using six-parameter model to determine the nature and magnitude of gene action of yield and its component traits in six inter-varietal crosses of urdbean. Result: Simple scaling test revealed that the digenic model (additive-dominance model) was inadequate for most of the traits, confirming the existence of non-allelic interactions for all of the crosses. Duplicate type of epistasis was reported for three traits in HimMash-1´Sirmour-2 (days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, harvest index), Palampur-93´Kullu-4 (days to 50% flowering, podlength, 100-seed weight) and Palampur-93´Chamba-8 (days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, podlength). Two in HimMash-1´Kullu-4 (days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity), HimMash-1´Chamba-8 (days to 50% flowering, 100-seed weight) and Palampur-93´Sirmour-2 (branches/plant, 100-seed weight). Hence, it was evident from the study that the bi-parental mating trailed by selection in advanced generations should be employed for harnessing desirable recombinants.

show abstract

Association and Multivariate Analysis of Yield and Yield Component Traits in Mungbean [Vigna radiata(L.) Wilczek]

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Correlation and Path Analysis in F4 Progenies of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] for Seed Yield and its Attributes

Correlation and Path Analysis in F4 Progenies of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] for Seed Yield and its Attributes

Exploring intra-allelic and inter-allelic gene interactions influencing seed yield and its components in inter-varietal crosses of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

Genetic evaluation of yield and its component traits by using generation mean analysis in inter-varietal crosses of urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About