1994
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association as a Psychological Justification for Ownership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following previous studies of principles underlying people's ownership judgments (e.g., Beggan & Brown, 1994;Friedman, 2008Friedman, , 2010Hook, 1993;, we examined participants' judgments about third-party vignettes in which two characters each want an object. Participants read vignettes in which an "agent" saw and then acted on an object, sometimes with the consequence of creating a new object.…”
Section: The Current Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following previous studies of principles underlying people's ownership judgments (e.g., Beggan & Brown, 1994;Friedman, 2008Friedman, , 2010Hook, 1993;, we examined participants' judgments about third-party vignettes in which two characters each want an object. Participants read vignettes in which an "agent" saw and then acted on an object, sometimes with the consequence of creating a new object.…”
Section: The Current Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in Beggan and Brown (1994) read a story about a boy who either played with a tree branch or carved it into the shape of an airplane. He then left the branch where he found it, and returned later to find it in someone else's possession.…”
Section: Existing Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal rulings support rights of possessors over those of nonpossessors (Dukeminier, Krier, Alexander, & Shill, 2006), and adults use possession as a cue to ownership when other information is absent. For example, in a direct study of this issue, undergraduates were told a story about a divorcing couple where both spouses lay claim to a particular possession (e.g., a TV) (Beggan & Brown, 1994). When shown pictures of one of the spouses with the TV and the other spouse alone, participants indicated that whichever spouse was pictured with the TV had a stronger claim on it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a psychological perspective, scholars have identified what we might term "proprietary" emotions, such as material possession attachment and place attachment; such research explores what property means to us as individuals and as a society, and the basic emotional traits associated with the broad constructs of "ownership" and "possession" (Beggan & Brown, 1994;Bloom, 1991;Rudmin, 1991). So far, however, little of this research has been mapped onto the field of law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%