We use a model of human capital investment and activity choice to explain facts describing gender differentials in the levels and returns to human capital investments. These include the higher return to and level of schooling, the small effect of healthiness on wages, and the large effect of healthiness on schooling for females relative to males. The model incorporates gender differences in the level and responsiveness of brawn to nutrition in a Roy-economy setting in which activities reward skill and brawn differentially. Empirical evidence from rural Bangladesh provides support for the model and the importance of the distribution of brawn.
KeywordsBrawn; health; schooling; gender Emerging evidence suggests that returns to investments in schooling and health systematically differ across men and women across a variety of settings. In particular, investments in health augment the schooling of women relative to men but increase the earnings of men relative to women, while investments in schooling have greater returns in the labor market for women. Two recent prominent randomized field experiments (Miguel and Kremer, 2004; Maluccio et al., 2009) in which the health of young children was experimentally increased, for example, indicated that schooling outcomes were improved significantly for females, but not in all cases for males. In Miguel and Kremer, although school attendance rates increased for both males and females in the first year of their deworming experiment in Kenya, only the school participation rates of girls in the second year of the experiment were statistically significantly higher in either treatment school compared with the control schools, and the point estimates were from 56% to 139% higher Notes: Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussions and critical comments. This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network electronic library at: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1673314An index to papers in the Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper Series is located at: http://www.econ.yale.edu/∼egcenter/ publications.html NIH Public Access
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript in magnitude for the girls (Table VIII, Panel B). And in Maluccio et al., the schooling attainment of girls but not boys was significantly increased as the result of a nutritional supplement provided in the first three years of life to children in Guatemala. Recent reviews of the returns to schooling also suggest that the returns to human capital investment are higher for women. Dougherty (2005), reviewing 27 studies reporting estimates of rates of return to schooling based on US data, found that in 18 the schooling coefficient was higher for females, while in only one study was the estimated return higher for males. Trostel et al. (2002) obtained estimates of schooling for 28 mainly developed counties and found that in only four countries was the schooling coefficient higher for men. And of the estimated gender-speci...