2020
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Anatomical and Clinical Outcomes of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated With Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Persistent subretinal fluid only in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration is compatible with good 12-month visual outcomes. Intraretinal fluid by contrast was associated with worse visual outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, mostly onlySRFL eyes had better VA at 5 years (63.7 letters), comparable with mostly inactive eyes (63.7 letters), and a higher proportion of eyes with VA ≥70 letters (51%). These data are consistent with other studies regarding the tolerability of SRFL in terms of VA (Chaudhary et al, 2022;Grunwald et al, 2017;Guymer et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2021;Zarbin et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Conversely, mostly onlySRFL eyes had better VA at 5 years (63.7 letters), comparable with mostly inactive eyes (63.7 letters), and a higher proportion of eyes with VA ≥70 letters (51%). These data are consistent with other studies regarding the tolerability of SRFL in terms of VA (Chaudhary et al, 2022;Grunwald et al, 2017;Guymer et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2021;Zarbin et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, a recent systematic review has demonstrated that after adjusting for the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, neither the treatment dosing regimen adopted, nor the anti-VEGF agent used, were significant predictors for visual acuity changes [ 13 ]. Nonetheless, other factors such as age, anatomical status of the retina, including the presence or absence of subretinal and/or intraretinal fluids, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness, and macular morphology have been implicated as important prognostic factors in determining visual outcomes [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post hoc analyses of clinical trials and real-world outcomes demonstrated that intraretinal fluid presence at baseline is associated with a worse visual prognosis [26,27]. Subretinal fluid at baseline does not affect the outcome but its fluctuation during the treatment course is associated with a poorer prognosis [27][28][29]. Differently from these two components, fluid located underneath the RPE has not been directly associated with visual outcomes although once again, the eyes with higher fluctuations have shown a trend towards a poorer vision [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fluid may be identified at different levels such as intraretinal, subretinal, and sub-RPE. Post hoc analyses of clinical trials and real-world outcomes demonstrated that intraretinal fluid presence at baseline is associated with a worse visual prognosis [26,27]. Subretinal fluid at baseline does not affect the outcome but its fluctuation during the treatment course is associated with a poorer prognosis [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%