Association Between Angina and Treatment Satisfaction after Myocardial Infarction

Plomondon, Mary E.; Magid, David J.; Jones, Philip G.; Barry, Lisa C.; Havranek, Edward P.; Peterson, Eric D.; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Spertus, John A.; Rumsfeld, John S.

doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0430-y

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Enrolling ~2500 patients from 19 US hospitals from 2003–2004, PREMIER was the first MI registry to focus on patients’ health status outcomes and also provide greater clinical detail of patients’ presentations and treatment than most previous cardiovascular registries. While prior registries were able to include more patients by collecting less data, the richer data collection of TRIUMPH and PREMIER is able to identify new predictors of outcomes, such as patients’ ability to afford healthcare, 39, 40 insurance status, 41 medication adherence, 15, 42 psychosocial and health status, 43, 44 and social support 45 and their association with long-term survival, hospitalization and health status. 46–49 It is through this collection of extensive data on patients’ social, economic, and psychological status (with reliable and valid instruments) that analyses of PREMIER have been able to identify how important these aspects are in influencing the long-term outcomes of patients after an MI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH)

Arnold

Chan

Jones

et al. 2011

Circ: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Self Cite

115

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Black patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have worse outcomes than white patients, including higher mortality, more angina, and worse quality of life. The TRIUMPH study was designed to examine whether racial differences in socioeconomic, clinical, genetic, metabolic, biomarker or treatment characteristics mediate observed disparities in outcomes. Methods and Results Between June 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008, 31567 patients with MI were prospectively screened, 6152 had an eligible MI, and 4340 (71%) were enrolled from 24 US centers. Consenting patients had detailed chart abstractions of their medical history and processes of inpatient care, supplemented with a detailed baseline interview. Detailed genetic and metabolic data were obtained at hospital discharge in 2979 (69%) and 3013 patients (69%), respectively. In a subset of patients, blood and urine samples were obtained at 1-month (obtained in 27% of survivors) and blood samples at 6-months (obtained in 19% of survivors). Centralized follow-up interviews sought to quantify patients’ post-discharge care and outcomes, with a focus on their health status (symptoms, function, and quality of life). At 1, 6 and 12 months, 23%, 27% and 24% were lost to follow-up. Vital status was available for 99% of patients at 12-months. Conclusions TRIUMPH is a novel MI registry with detailed information on patients’ socio-demographic, clinical, treatment, health status, metabolic, and genetic characteristics. The wealth of patient data collected in TRIUMPH will provide unique opportunities to examine factors that may mediate racial differences in mortality and health status after MI and the complex interactions between genetic and environmental determinants of post-MI outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH)

Arnold

Chan

Jones

et al. 2011

Circ: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Self Cite

115

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They reported that patients who were less satisfied with their operation or post‐operative care reported being less involved in the initial decisions about surgery. A recent study found an association between angina and current treatment satisfaction among patients six months post‐MI, 33 but that study was cross‐sectional and cause and effect could not be determined.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Is patient involvement during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction associated with post‐discharge treatment outcome? An exploratory study

Arnetz

Winblad

Höglund

et al. 2010

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To investigate whether patient involvement during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (MI) was associated with health and behavioural outcomes 6-10 weeks after hospital discharge.Background Patient involvement has been associated with improved health outcomes in chronic disease, but less research has focused on the effects of patient involvement in acute conditions, such as MI.

show abstract

“…The present study examined satisfaction early after a myocardial infarction and not chronic coronary disease, in which resurgence of anginal symptoms may have more of an impact on the proclivity to worsening satisfaction with treatment. 34 Finally, the present study was limited to patients with myocardial infarction, and similar analyses should be considered for other chronic diseases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Lee

Chong

et al. 2008

Circulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background-Patient satisfaction is a widely used measurement for the evaluation of medical care. We examined the extent to which quality of care received after acute myocardial infarction predicted subsequent patient satisfaction with care and whether patient satisfaction itself was associated with long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. PϽ0.001). Quality indicators for myocardial infarction care and clinical outcomes were not associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusions-Satisfaction with care was more likely in patients who were older, in those without depression, and in those with better functional capacity, but it was not associated with the quality of myocardial infarction care or survival. Methods and Results-In

show abstract

Association Between Angina and Treatment Satisfaction after Myocardial Infarction

Cited by 18 publications

References 28 publications

Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH)

Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH)

Is patient involvement during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction associated with post‐discharge treatment outcome? An exploratory study

Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About