Summary Uncontrolled studies have reported that fatigue is a common symptom among patients with advanced cancer. It is also a frequent complaint among the general population. Simply asking cancer patients whether or not they feel fatigued does not distinguish between the 'background' level of this symptom in the community and any 'excess' arising as a result of illness. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of fatigue among palliative care inpatients in comparison with a control group of age and sex-matched volunteers without cancer. In addition, the correlates of fatigue were investigated. The prevalence of 'severe subjective fatigue' (defined as fatigue greater than that experienced by 95% of the control group) was found to be 75%. Patients were malnourished, had diminished muscle function and were suffering from a number of physical and mental symptoms. The severity of fatigue was unrelated to age, sex, diagnosis, presence or site of metastases, anaemia, dose of opioid or steroid, any of the haematological or biochemical indices (except urea), nutritional status, voluntary muscle function, or mood. A multivariate analysis found that fatigue severity was significantly associated with pain and dypnoea scores in the patients, and with the symptoms of anxiety and depression in the controls. The authors conclude that subjective fatigue is both prevalent and severe among patients with advanced cancer. The causes of this symptom remain obscure. Further work is required in order to determine if the associations reported between fatigue and pain and between fatigue and dyspnoea are causal or coincidental.Keywords: fatigue; asthenia; neoplasms; palliative care; quality of life
1479British Journal of Cancer (1999) 79(9/10), 1479-1486 © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Article no. bjoc.1998 Received
SUBJECTS AND METHODSInpatients with advanced cancer were recruited from three palliative care units between April 1996 and January 1997. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the previous 4 weeks, clinically apparent confusion, poor English language skills, disability or pain affecting the non-dominant hand or an estimated prognosis of less than 2 weeks were all exclusion criteria. The principal investigator visited each of the participating units weekly and approached all patients identified as being eligible to enter the study. In the absence of the principal investigator, due to holidays or illness, recruitment was suspended. Thus, although the patient group did not represent a consecutive series of eligible patients (i.e. it was a convenience sample), there is no reason to suspect a systematic bias in patient selection. Control subjects were age and sex-matched volunteers without cancer. They were recruited from the 'League of Friends' at the respective units and were subjected to the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the patients. The protocol was approved by the relevant Scientific and Ethics Committees.After informed consent had been obtained, the patients were asked to undergo a number of assessme...